Prosecutions for June 2011
Referring Agency: Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security
Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during June 2011 the government reported 8995 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 5.7% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)
When monthly 2011 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the number of filings was down (-2.6 percent).
Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 121.4 percent from levels reported in 2006.
The substantial growth in
these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases
are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in
prosecutions is 33 percent instead of 121.4 percent.
The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases
by the Justice Department.
Figure 1: Monthly trends in prosecutions
The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1.
The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month
basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court,
the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends.
The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.
Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.
The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in June 2011 was for "Immigration", accounting for 86.7 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (7.5%).
See Figure 2.
Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions
Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In June 2011, 7383 defendants
in cases for these matters were
filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In
addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before
an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter
starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court
where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in June the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge
for 53.2 percent of all magistrate filings in June.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (31.5%).
Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In June 2011, 1612 defendants in new cases
for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during June there
were an additional 1844 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate
courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information
was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and
therefore cover all matters filed in district court during June.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters
filed in U.S. District Court during June 2011referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.
Table 2: Top charges filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324.
"Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841.
"Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest
increase in prosecutions—up 128.8 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 846
that involves " Attempt and conspiracy
This was the same statute that had the largest increase—160.8 %—when compared with five years ago.
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest
decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 26.7 percent—was
Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.
(Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ).
Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions— 37.6 percent—was
for filings where the lead charge was " Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
In June 2011 the Justice Department said the government brought 1350.9 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.
Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3.
Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.
Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)
The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 22505 prosecutions as compared with 1350.9 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during June 2011.
The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 for most frequent use five years ago.
The District of New Mexico ranked 2nd.
The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 for most frequent use five years ago.
District of Arizona is now ranking 3rd.
The District of Arizona was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were
Utah , now ranked
, and North Dakota
In the same order, these districts ranked 11th and 29th one year ago and 10th and 31st five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth
in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 131.3 percent—was
Northern District of Iowa (Cedar Rapids).
Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 157.7 percent—was
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the
largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 30.8 percent—was
North Dakota .
But over the past five years,
showed the largest drop— percent.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during June 2011 are shown in Table 4.
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita.
Judge Philip Ray Martinez in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 82 defendants in cases.
Judge Martinez appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 10) and five years ago (rank 7).
Judge John Edwards Conway in the District of New Mexico ranked 2nd with 81 defendants in cases.
Judge David C. Bury in the District of Arizona ranked 3rd with 79 defendants in cases.
Report Generated: September 13, 2011