Prosecutions for June 2009

Referring Agency: Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security

Number Latest Month 11,090
Percent Change from previous month 46.9
Percent Change from 1 year ago 8.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 109.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 32.8

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during June 2009 the government reported 11090 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 46.9% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2009 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was up (8.9 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 109.6 percent from levels reported in 2004.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in prosecutions is 32.8 percent instead of 109.6 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,886 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 2,061 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 2,489 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 2,158 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 2,176 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 2,197 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 2,043 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 2,176 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,872 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,974 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,929 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,884 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,808 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,929 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 2,261 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 2,448 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 2,427 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 2,107 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 2,206 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 2,325 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 2,052 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 2,264 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 2,173 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 2,320 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 2,212 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 2,562 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 2,705 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 2,290 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 2,484 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 2,298 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 2,394 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 2,204 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 2,199 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 2,480 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 2,172 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 3,952 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 3,422 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 3,207 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 4,426 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 4,676 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 4,505 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 4,070 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 3,726 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 4,666 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 4,661 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 3,055 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 3,053 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 3,240 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 2,591 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 3,023 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 3,963 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 3,584 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 4,226 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 4,642 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 4,183 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 4,233 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 5,201 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 4,016 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 3,319 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 3,296 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 3,364 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 3,388 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 4,151 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 3,392 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 3,851 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 4,202 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 3,537 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 4,274 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 4,596 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 3,320 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 3,493 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 3,089 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 3,580 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 3,622 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 4,517 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 4,271 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 4,326 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 4,348 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 3,566 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 4,383 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 5,471 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 4,468 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 3,752 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 4,354 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 4,322 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 6,709 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 8,754 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 8,899 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 8,803 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 9,292 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 9,286 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 7,013 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 12,274 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 9,461 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 7,300 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 7,159 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 7,190 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 7,514 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 9,013 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 8,588 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 7,547 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 11,090 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 2161.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 2187.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 2206.5 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 2103.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 2073 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 2031.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1979.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1940.5 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1899.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1964.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 2043.1666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 2126.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 2163.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 2229.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 2295.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 2260.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 2230.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 2187.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 2223.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 2224.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 2263.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 2372.6666667 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 2377 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 2428.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 2425.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 2455.5 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 2395.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 2311.5 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 2343.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 2291.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 2566.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 2738.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 2905.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 3276.5 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 3642.5 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 4031.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 4051 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 4101.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 4344.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 4384 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 4113.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 3871.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 3733.5 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 3544.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 3270.5 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 3154.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 3242.3333333 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 3437.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 3671.5 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 3936.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 4138.5 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 4344.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 4416.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 4265.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 4041.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 3904.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 3764 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 3589 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 3485 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 3573.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 3724.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 3753.5 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 3901.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 3975.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 3963.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 3903.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 3718.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 3725.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 3616.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 3603.5 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 3762 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 3900.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 4110.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 4108.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 4235.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 4394.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 4427 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 4331.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 4332.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 4458.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 4846 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 5393.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 6131.6666667 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 6973.5 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 7796.5 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 8623.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 8674.5 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 9261.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 9354.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 9104.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 8748.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 8399.5 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 8483 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 7939.5 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 7794 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 7835.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 8490.3333333
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Prosecutions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in June 2009 was for "Immigration", accounting for 88.9 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (6.9%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.28%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 89%  (88.85%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 7%  (6.86%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 7%  (6.86%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 7%  (6.86%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In June 2009, 71 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in June the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 65.7 percent of all magistrate filings in June.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (24.7%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during June 2009referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,949 1 1 1 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 279 2 2 2 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 279 2 3 3 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 139 4 6 5 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 113 5 5 8 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 93 6 4 4 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 54 7 7 6 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 41 8 9 11 More
18 USC 911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 25 9 12 9 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 21 10 11 12 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency were the lead charges "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 and "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago.."Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 53.8 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 that involves " Importation of controlled substances ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—184.5 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 35.6 percent—was Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 52.5 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In June 2009 the Justice Department said the government brought 1305 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Cal, S 17,655 457 1 3 4 More
N Mexico 15,816 256 2 5 5 More
Texas, W 13,655 653 3 2 2 More
Texas, S 9,902 656 4 1 1 More
Arizona 6,150 316 5 4 3 More
N. Y., W 2,235 52 6 17 25 More
Ark, W 1,833 19 7 36 37 More
N Dakota 1,694 9 8 57 24 More
Ill, S 1,415 15 9 62 70 More
Nebraska 1,225 18 10 38 46 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 17655 prosecutions as compared with 1305 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during June 2009. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

  • The District of New Mexico ranked 2nd. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Western District of New York (Buffalo), now ranked 6th , and Western District of Arkansas (Fort Smith) at 7th In the same order, these districts ranked 17th and 36th one year ago and 25th and 37th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 60.7 percent—was North Dakota . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 167.7 percent—was Nebraska .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 1.6 percent—was Western District of Arkansas (Fort Smith).  But over the past five years, North Dakota showed the largest drop— 35.7 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during June 2009 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 143 1 1 3 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 135 2 2 - More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 132 3 9 7 More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 126 4 3 1 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 99 5 7 9 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 86 6 4 6 More
Briones, David Texas, W 83 7 5 5 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 69 8 6 11 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 68 9 8 16 More
Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 60 10 10 13 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita.

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 143 defendants in cases. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 3).

  • Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 135 defendants in cases. Judge Alvarezalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 2).

  • Judge Frank Montalvo in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 3rd with 132 defendants in cases. Judge Montalvo appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 9) and five years ago (rank 7).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page