Convictions for July 2012

Referring Agency: Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security

Number Latest Month 9,007
Percent Change from previous month 3.4
Percent Change from 1 year ago 14.1
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 155.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 54.7
Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2012 the government reported 9007 new convictions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 3.4% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2012 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was up (14.1 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 155.6 percent from levels reported in 2007.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in convictions is 54.7 percent instead of 155.6 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

Plot of _FREQ_ by FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in convictions

The increase from the levels five years ago in convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of convictions of these matters in July 2012 was for "Immigration", accounting for 89.9 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (6.5%). See Figure 2.

Pie chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions

Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2012, 6095 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in July the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 74.7 percent of all magistrate convictions in July.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (21.4%).

Convictions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2012, 2912 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 0 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2012referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,752 1 1 1 More
08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 188 2 2 2 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A 183 3 3 3 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 174 4 7 6 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 120 5 4 4 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 77 6 5 7 More
08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 45 7 6 5 More
18 USC 1544 - Misuse of passport 42 8 13 26 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 38 9 8 9 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 30 10 11 12 More
Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 323.3 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 that involves " Attempt and conspiracy ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—1123.1 percent—was registered for convictions under " Misuse of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1544 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 18.6 percent—was Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 23.3 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2012 the Justice Department said the government obtained 1138.2 convictions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 convictions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Cal, S 14,978 402 1 4 3 More
N Mexico 12,360 207 2 5 5 More
Arizona 11,771 647 3 2 4 More
Texas, W 10,354 529 4 3 2 More
Texas, S 4,352 305 5 1 1 More
Wyoming 1,984 9 6 39 73 More
N Dakota 1,670 9 7 34 56 More
N. Y., W 1,552 36 8 16 18 More
Iowa, N 1,196 13 9 20 42 More
Idaho 1,087 14 10 36 37 More
Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 14978 convictions as compared with 1138.2 convictions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during July 2012. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • The District of New Mexico ranked 2nd. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • District of Arizona is now ranking 3rd. The District of Arizona was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Western District of New York (Buffalo), now ranked 8th , and Northern District of Iowa (Cedar Rapids) at 9th In the same order, these districts ranked 16th and 20th one year ago and 18th and 42nd five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago— 27 percent—was Western District of Texas (San Antonio). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 274.4 percent—was Arizona .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of convictions— 48.4 percent—was Wyoming .  But over the past five years, showed the largest drop— percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during July 2012 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Moses, Alia Texas, W 156 1 2 - More
Jorgenson, Cindy K. Arizona 80 2 10 33 More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 74 3 13 1 More
Zipps, Jennifer Guerin Arizona 64 4 - - More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 61 5 7 10 More
Wake, Neil Vincent Arizona 60 6 42 48 More
Bury, David C. Arizona 59 7 6 28 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 59 7 16 5 More
Collins, Raner Christercunean Arizona 58 9 5 25 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 58 9 8 6 More
Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of convictions per capita.

  • Judge Alia Moses in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 156 convicted in convictions. Judge Mosesalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 2).

  • Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson in the District of Arizona ranked 2nd with 80 convicted in convictions. Judge Jorgensonalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 10).

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 3rd with 74 convicted in convictions.

Report Generated: October 1, 2012
TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2012, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page