Prosecutions for July 2009

Referring Agency: Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security

Number Latest Month 8,946
Percent Change from previous month -4.5
Percent Change from 1 year ago -1.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 108.5
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 20.6

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2009 the government reported 8946 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 4.5% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2009 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was only slightlydown (-1.9 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 108.5 percent from levels reported in 2004.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in prosecutions is 20.6 percent instead of 108.5 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,886 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 2,063 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 2,490 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 2,158 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 2,178 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 2,198 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 2,043 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 2,177 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,873 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,975 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,929 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,885 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,809 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,930 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 2,263 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 2,450 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 2,432 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 2,110 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 2,209 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 2,329 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 2,059 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 2,273 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 2,178 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 2,332 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 2,223 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 2,568 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 2,732 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 2,320 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 2,509 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 2,347 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 2,577 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 2,494 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 3,243 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 2,349 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 2,218 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 3,713 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 3,766 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 3,274 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 4,385 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 4,581 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 4,537 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 3,815 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 3,680 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 4,606 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 3,327 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 3,077 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 2,913 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 2,850 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 2,965 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 3,103 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 3,904 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 3,485 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 4,207 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 4,459 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 4,108 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 4,094 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 4,083 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 3,759 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 3,380 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 3,175 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 3,662 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 3,420 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 4,084 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 3,372 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 3,798 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 3,988 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 3,483 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 3,777 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 3,501 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 3,371 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 3,387 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 3,049 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 3,789 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 3,811 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 4,418 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 4,314 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 4,440 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 4,081 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 3,456 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 4,258 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 4,062 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 4,436 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 3,722 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 4,080 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 4,640 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 6,973 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 8,797 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 8,866 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 8,610 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 9,172 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 9,199 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 6,918 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 10,673 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 9,254 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 7,425 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 6,771 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 7,498 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 7,624 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 9,044 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 8,221 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 7,405 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 9,372 FYMONDT: Jul2009
_FREQ_: 8,946 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 2162.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 2188.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 2207.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 2104.5 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 2074 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 2032.5 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1980.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1941.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1900.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1965.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 2044.3333333 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 2128.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 2165.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 2232.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 2298.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 2264.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 2235.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 2193 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 2230 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 2232.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 2272.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 2384.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 2392.1666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 2447.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 2449.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 2508.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 2496.5 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 2581.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 2586.5 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 2538 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 2765.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 2963.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 3093.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 3284.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 3656.1666667 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 4042.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 4059.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 4045.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 4267.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 4091 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 3840.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 3569.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 3408.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 3289.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 3039.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 3135.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 3203.3333333 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 3419 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 3687.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 3877.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 4042.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 4072.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 4118.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 3980.5 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 3766.5 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 3692.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 3579.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 3580 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 3515.5 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 3585.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 3720.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 3690.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 3750.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 3653.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 3653 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 3584.5 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 3428 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 3479 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 3484.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 3637.5 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 3794.6666667 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 3970.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 4142.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 4086.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 4161.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 4101.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 4122.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 4002.5 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 4002.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 4199.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 4652.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 5441.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 6179.6666667 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 6994.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 7843 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 8602.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 8593.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 8906.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 8971 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 8773.5 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 8373.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 8089.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 8207.5 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 7936 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 7763.8333333 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 7760.5 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 8194 FYMONDT: Jul2009
moveave: 8435.3333333
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in prosecutions

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in July 2009 was for "Immigration", accounting for 91 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (4.8%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 4%  (4.25%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 91%  (91%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.75%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.75%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.75%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2009, 7455 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in July the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 65.5 percent of all magistrate filings in July.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (24.7%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2009, 1491 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 1808 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2009referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 2,089 1 1 1 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 285 2 3 3 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 251 3 2 2 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 137 4 6 5 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 104 5 5 7 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 94 6 4 4 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 43 7 7 6 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 36 8 9 11 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 21 9 11 12 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 12 10 8 8 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 56.8 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 that involves " Importation of controlled substances ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—164.3 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 73.6 percent—was Fraud/false statements or entries generally (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1001 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 72.8 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2009 the Justice Department said the government brought 1325.1 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 20,450 331 1 5 5 More
Cal, S 14,256 369 2 3 3 More
Texas, W 10,434 499 3 2 2 More
Texas, S 9,646 639 4 1 1 More
Arizona 8,914 458 5 4 4 More
Wyoming 5,149 22 6 64 72 More
N Dakota 3,200 17 7 56 24 More
Montana 1,521 12 8 41 42 More
Fla, S 1,420 77 9 6 7 More
Utah 1,116 24 10 18 14 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico—with 20450 prosecutions as compared with 1325.1 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during July 2009. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 five years ago.

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Utah , now ranked 10th , and Montana at 8th In the same order, these districts ranked 18th and 41st one year ago and 14th and 42nd five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 185.7 percent—was Wyoming . This was the same district that had the largest increase— 445.5 %—when compared with five years ago.

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 22.4 percent—was Montana .  But over the past five years, North Dakota showed the largest drop— 21.4 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during July 2009 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 180 1 1 3 More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 124 2 3 1 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 121 3 2 - More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 87 4 8 10 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 86 5 9 14 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 66 6 4 8 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 65 7 6 6 More
Briones, David Texas, W 63 8 4 5 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 61 9 7 4 More
Tagle, Hilda G. Texas, S 46 10 11 17 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita.

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 180 defendants in cases. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 3).

  • Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 124 defendants in cases. Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 3) and five years ago (rank 1).

  • Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 121 defendants in cases. Judge Alvarezalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 2).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page