Convictions for April 2008

Referring Agency: Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security

Number Latest Month 7,944
Percent Change from previous month -9.2
Percent Change from 1 year ago 85.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 193.7
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 26.6

Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during April 2008 the government reported 7944 new convictions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 9.2% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2008 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was up (85.6 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 193.7 percent from levels reported in 2003.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in convictions is 26.6 percent instead of 193.7 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 2,055 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,809 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 2,075 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,707 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,700 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,688 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,841 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,738 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,810 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,843 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,518 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,572 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,823 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,636 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,777 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 1,772 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,970 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,657 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 2,058 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,864 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,965 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 2,133 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 1,527 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 1,772 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 2,083 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 2,112 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 2,556 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 2,141 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 2,080 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 2,318 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,963 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 1,869 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 2,514 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 1,938 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 1,934 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 3,222 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 3,137 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 2,567 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 3,349 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 3,650 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 4,473 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 3,448 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 2,963 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 4,086 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 2,615 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 2,683 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 2,437 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 2,981 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 2,446 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 2,691 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 3,171 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 2,865 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 3,813 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 3,972 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 3,630 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 4,218 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 4,012 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 3,571 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 3,027 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 3,052 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 3,492 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 3,368 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 3,742 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 3,099 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 3,385 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 3,663 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 3,345 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 4,027 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 3,615 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 3,157 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 2,816 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 2,544 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 3,187 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 3,330 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 3,613 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 3,807 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 3,428 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 3,684 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 2,915 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 3,363 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 4,293 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 3,751 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 3,465 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 4,611 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 3,948 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 7,094 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 8,748 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 7,944 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1839 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1803.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1791.5 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1747.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1770 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1739.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1720.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1717.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1700.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1694.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1683 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1758.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1772.5 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1811.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1849.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1881 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1941.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1867.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1886.5 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1890.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1932 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 2030.5 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 2031.8333333 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 2124 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 2215 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 2195 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 2154.5 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 2147.5 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 2113.6666667 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 2089.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 2240 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 2435.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 2552 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 2691.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 2976.5 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 3399.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 3437.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 3408.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 3661.5 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 3539.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 3378 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 3038.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 2960.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 2874.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 2642.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 2734.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 2765.1666667 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 2994.5 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 3159.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 3357 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 3611.5 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 3751.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 3869.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 3738.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 3585 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 3562 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 3420.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 3375.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 3296.6666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 3356.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 3458.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 3433.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 3543.5 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 3522.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 3532 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 3437.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 3250.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 3224.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 3108.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 3107.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 3216.1666667 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 3318.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 3508.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 3462.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 3468.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 3581.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 3572.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 3578.5 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 3733 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 3905.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 4527 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 5269.5 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 5968.3333333
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Convictions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of convictions of these matters in April 2008 was for "Immigration", accounting for 92.2 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (4.6%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 3%  (3.2%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 92%  (92.23%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 5%  (4.57%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions

Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In April 2008, 69 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in April the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 91.3 percent of all magistrate convictions in April.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (6.4%).

Convictions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during April 2008referred by the Immigration and Customs in Homeland Security.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,225 1 1 1 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 299 2 2 3 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 231 3 3 2 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 134 4 5 5 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 98 5 6 7 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 94 6 4 4 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 50 7 7 6 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 37 8 9 14 More
18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 30 9 8 12 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 21 10 12 13 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 21 10 11 8 More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 61.1 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 2252 that involves " Material involving sexual exploitation of minors ". This was the same statute that had the largest increase—331.9 %—when compared with five years ago.

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 19.8 percent—was Importation of controlled substances (Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 50.6 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In April 2008 the Justice Department said the government obtained 975.6 convictions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 convictions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Cal, S 13,502 349 1 3 2 More
N Mexico 10,805 176 2 5 5 More
Texas, W 8,736 418 3 2 3 More
Texas, S 7,392 493 4 1 4 More
Arizona 4,495 231 5 4 1 More
Fla, S 1,956 107 6 6 6 More
Ark, E 1,534 20 7 69 71 More
Ala, S 1,324 9 8 51 88 More
Idaho 1,309 16 9 49 27 More
La, E 1,174 14 10 36 66 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 13502 convictions as compared with 975.6 convictions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during April 2008. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

  • The District of New Mexico ranked 2nd. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans), now ranked 10th , and Idaho at 9th In the same order, these districts ranked 36th and 49th one year ago and 66th and 27th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago— 246.2 percent—was Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 1900 percent—was Southern District of Alabama (Mobile).

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during April 2008 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Briones, David Texas, W 116 1 4 1 More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 93 2 2 7 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 91 3 11 12 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 88 4 5 2 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 84 5 1 - More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 81 6 6 478 More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 74 7 3 - More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 66 8 10 14 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 58 9 7 390 More
Thompson, Gordon Jr. Cal, S 40 10 12 4 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of convictions per capita.

  • Judge David Briones in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 116 convicted in convictions. Judge Briones appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 4) and five years ago (rank 1).

  • Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 93 convicted in convictions. Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 2) and five years ago (rank 7).

  • Judge Randy Crane in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 91 convicted in convictions.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2008, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page