Official Corruption Convictions for May 2013
Table 1: Criminal Official Corruption Convictions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during May 2013 the government reported 43 new official corruption convictions.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 6.5% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for official corruption-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom
of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)
When monthly 2013 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the number of convictions was up (2.8 percent).
Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 2.1 percent from levels reported in 2008.
Figure 1: Monthly trends in official corruption convictions
The leveling out from the levels five years ago in official corruption convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1.
The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of official corruption convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month
basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court,
the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends.
The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Within the broad category of official corruption, cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.
Case types within official corruption are
Federal Corruption - Procurement
Federal Corruption - Program
Federal Corruption - Law Enforcement
Federal Corruption - Other
Other Public Corruption
The largest number of convictions of these matters in May 2013 was for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Other", accounting for 34.9 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Procurement" (20.9%), "
Corruption(Govt Off)-Local" (18.6%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Law Enforcement" (7%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Program" (7%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-State" (7%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Other" (4.7%).
See Figure 2.
The lead investigative agency for official corruption convictions in May 2013
was FBI accounting for 40 percent of convictions.
Other agencies with substantial numbers of official corruption convictions were:
Defense (16% ), Postal (14%), ATF (9%), DHS (7%).
See Figure 3.
Figure 2: Specific types of convictions
Figure 3: Convictions by investigative agency
Official Corruption Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In May 2013, 1 defendants
in official corruption cases for these matters were
filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In
addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before
an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter
starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court
where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in May the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 18 U.S.C Section 641 involving the "Public money, property or records". This was the lead charge
for 100 percent of all magistrate convictions in May.
Official Corruption Convictions in U.S. District Courts
In May 2013, 42 defendants in new cases
for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during May there
were an additional 0 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate
courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information
was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and
therefore cover all matters filed in district court during May.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of official corruption matters
filed in U.S. District Court during May 2013.
Table 2: Top charges for convictions
"Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 371) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
Ranked 2nd in frequency were the lead charges "Public money, property or records" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 641 and "Theft or bribery in programs receiving Fed funds" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 666.
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
In May 2013 the Justice Department said the government obtained 16.4 official corruption convictions for every ten million people in the United States.
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of official corruption convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of convictions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Top 10 districts
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new official corruption crime cases resulting in convictions of this type
during May 2013 are shown in Table 4.
All 28 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of official corruption convictions . (Because of ties, there were a total of 28 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)
Judge James Parker Jones in the Western District of Virginia (Roanoke) ranked 1st with 4 convicted in official corruption convictions.
Judges Larry Alan Burns in the Southern District of California (San Diego), Kathryn Hoefer Vratil in the District of Kansas and William D. Quarles, Jr. in the District of Maryland ranked 2nd with 3 convicted
in official corruption convictions.
Report Generated: July 22, 2013