Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2009
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 2,542 1,300 1,122 44.1 -
Ala, N Birmingham 16 5 5 31.3 69
Ala, M Montgomery 5 5 4 80.0 5
Ala, S Mobile 9 1 1 11.1 88
Alaska Anchorage 5 5 4 80.0 5
Arizona Phoenix 42 19 17 40.5 51
Ark, E Little Rock 9 3 3 33.3 63
Ark, W Fort Smith 13 3 3 23.1 81
Cal, N San Francisco 48 26 19 39.6 54
Cal, C Los Angeles 139 57 51 36.7 58
Cal, E Sacramento 77 35 30 39.0 55
Cal, S San Diego 19 9 6 31.6 67
Colorado Denver 32 10 8 25.0 78
Conn New Haven 56 29 25 44.6 47
Delaware Wilmington 9 4 3 33.3 63
D. C. Washington 3 0 0 0.0 89
Fla, N Pensacola 12 2 2 16.7 83
Fla, M Tampa 64 24 19 29.7 74
Fla, S Miami 92 63 56 60.9 25
Ga, N Atlanta 28 23 19 67.9 19
Ga, M Macon 32 18 17 53.1 34
Ga, S Savannah 11 5 5 45.5 43
Hawaii Honolulu 13 11 9 69.2 18
Idaho Boise 18 18 16 88.9 2
Ill, N Chicago 67 34 30 44.8 46
Ill, S East St. Louis 29 20 9 31.0 71
Ill, C Springfield 9 8 8 88.9 2
Ind, N South Bend 15 11 11 73.3 15
Ind, S Indianapolis 33 12 11 33.3 63
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 11 4 3 27.3 77
Iowa, S Des Moines 8 1 1 12.5 86
Kansas Topeka 20 10 7 35.0 60
Ken, E Lexington 23 11 11 47.8 42
Ken, W Louisville 94 13 12 12.8 85
La, E New Orleans 5 4 4 80.0 5
La, M Baton Rouge 6 3 3 50.0 35
La, W Shreveport 25 12 10 40.0 52
Maine Portland 6 1 1 16.7 83
Maryland Baltimore 45 36 34 75.6 11
Mass Boston 34 17 13 38.2 57
Mich, E Detroit 66 50 46 69.7 17
Mich, W Grand Rapids 9 7 7 77.8 9
MinnesotaMinneapolis 53 39 36 67.9 19
Miss, N Oxford 7 2 2 28.6 76
Miss, S Jackson 26 11 8 30.8 72
Mo, E St. Louis 26 9 9 34.6 61
Mo, W Kansas City 19 7 6 31.6 67
Montana Billings 14 10 5 35.7 59
Nebraska Omaha 5 3 3 60.0 27
Nevada Las Vegas 31 13 12 38.7 56
New Hamp Concord 7 4 4 57.1 30
N. J. Newark 58 42 35 60.3 26
N Mexico Albuquerque 3 1 1 33.3 63
N. Y., N Syracuse 20 14 12 60.0 27
N. Y., E Brooklyn 44 34 33 75.0 12
N. Y., S Manhattan 44 29 26 59.1 29
N. Y., W Buffalo 40 23 22 55.0 32
N Car, E Raleigh 22 10 10 45.5 43
N Car, M Greensboro 8 1 1 12.5 86
N Car, W Asheville 21 6 5 23.8 80
N Dakota Fargo 6 3 3 50.0 35
Ohio, N Cleveland 43 31 27 62.8 22
Ohio, S Cincinnati 48 30 27 56.3 31
Okla, N Tulsa 13 4 4 30.8 72
Okla, E Muskogee 2 1 1 50.0 35
Okla, W Oklahoma City 10 7 7 70.0 16
Oregon Portland 30 13 12 40.0 52
Penn, E Philadelphia 31 25 24 77.4 10
Penn, M Scranton 16 13 10 62.5 23
Penn, W Pittsburgh 47 29 23 48.9 40
R. I. Providence 4 3 1 25.0 78
S Car Columbia 19 14 12 63.2 21
S Dakota Sioux Falls 6 5 5 83.3 4
Tenn, E Knoxville 8 5 5 62.5 23
Tenn, M Nashville 11 5 5 45.5 43
Tenn, W Memphis 12 10 9 75.0 12
Texas, N Fort Worth 77 28 24 31.2 70
Texas, E Tyler 39 23 19 48.7 41
Texas, S Houston 42 28 23 54.8 33
Texas, W San Antonio 59 23 20 33.9 62
Utah Salt Lake City 12 9 9 75.0 12
Vermont Burlington 1 1 1 100.0 1
Virg, E Alexandria 44 20 19 43.2 49
Virg, W Roanoke 14 6 6 42.9 50
Wash, E Spokane 8 1 0 0.0 89
Wash, W Seattle 37 17 11 29.7 74
W Virg, NWheeling 16 9 7 43.8 48
W Virg, SCharleston 68 16 13 19.1 82
Wisc, E Milwaukee 10 6 5 50.0 35
Wisc, W Madison 4 2 2 50.0 35
Wyoming Cheyenne 5 4 4 80.0 5

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010