Percent of IRS Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2009
Districts in Alphabetical Order -- Tax Fraud


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

Non-TaxTax-Fraud
DistrictCityTotal ReferralsPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 1,122 44.1 - 55.9 -
Ala, N Birmingham 5 80.0 10 20.0 78
Ala, M Montgomery 4 0.0 72 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
Alaska Anchorage 4 50.0 32 50.0 55
Arizona Phoenix 17 52.9 31 47.1 58
Ark, E Little Rock 3 0.0 72 100.0 1
Ark, W Fort Smith 3 33.3 50 66.7 35
Cal, N San Francisco 19 36.8 49 63.2 40
Cal, C Los Angeles 51 41.2 43 58.8 46
Cal, E Sacramento 30 26.7 61 73.3 28
Cal, S San Diego 6 16.7 66 83.3 23
Colorado Denver 8 62.5 21 37.5 68
Conn New Haven 25 44.0 40 56.0 49
Delaware Wilmington 3 33.3 50 66.7 35
D. C. Washington 0 - - - -
Fla, N Pensacola 2 0.0 72 100.0 1
Fla, M Tampa 19 5.3 71 94.7 18
Fla, S Miami 56 57.1 24 42.9 63
Ga, N Atlanta 19 42.1 41 57.9 48
Ga, M Macon 17 5.9 70 94.1 19
Ga, S Savannah 5 20.0 64 80.0 24
Hawaii Honolulu 9 77.8 12 22.2 76
Idaho Boise 16 81.3 9 18.8 80
Ill, N Chicago 30 40.0 44 60.0 43
Ill, S East St. Louis 9 55.6 27 44.4 61
Ill, C Springfield 8 25.0 62 75.0 26
Ind, N South Bend 11 54.5 29 45.5 60
Ind, S Indianapolis 11 45.5 38 54.5 51
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 3 0.0 72 100.0 1
Iowa, S Des Moines 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
Kansas Topeka 7 57.1 24 42.9 63
Ken, E Lexington 11 90.9 7 9.1 82
Ken, W Louisville 12 41.7 42 58.3 47
La, E New Orleans 4 0.0 72 100.0 1
La, M Baton Rouge 3 0.0 72 100.0 1
La, W Shreveport 10 40.0 44 60.0 43
Maine Portland 1 0.0 72 100.0 1
Maryland Baltimore 34 32.4 55 67.6 34
Mass Boston 13 69.2 16 30.8 73
Mich, E Detroit 46 54.3 30 45.7 59
Mich, W Grand Rapids 7 57.1 24 42.9 63
MinnesotaMinneapolis 36 47.2 37 52.8 52
Miss, N Oxford 2 0.0 72 100.0 1
Miss, S Jackson 8 37.5 47 62.5 42
Mo, E St. Louis 9 55.6 27 44.4 61
Mo, W Kansas City 6 33.3 50 66.7 35
Montana Billings 5 60.0 22 40.0 67
Nebraska Omaha 3 0.0 72 100.0 1
Nevada Las Vegas 12 25.0 62 75.0 26
New Hamp Concord 4 75.0 14 25.0 75
N. J. Newark 35 37.1 48 62.9 41
N Mexico Albuquerque 1 0.0 72 100.0 1
N. Y., N Syracuse 12 33.3 50 66.7 35
N. Y., E Brooklyn 33 48.5 35 51.5 54
N. Y., S Manhattan 26 26.9 60 73.1 29
N. Y., W Buffalo 22 59.1 23 40.9 66
N Car, E Raleigh 10 30.0 57 70.0 32
N Car, M Greensboro 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
N Car, W Asheville 5 40.0 44 60.0 43
N Dakota Fargo 3 33.3 50 66.7 35
Ohio, N Cleveland 27 29.6 58 70.4 31
Ohio, S Cincinnati 27 77.8 12 22.2 76
Okla, N Tulsa 4 0.0 72 100.0 1
Okla, E Muskogee 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
Okla, W Oklahoma City 7 0.0 72 100.0 1
Oregon Portland 12 66.7 18 33.3 70
Penn, E Philadelphia 24 12.5 67 87.5 22
Penn, M Scranton 10 80.0 10 20.0 78
Penn, W Pittsburgh 23 65.2 20 34.8 69
R. I. Providence 1 0.0 72 100.0 1
S Car Columbia 12 50.0 32 50.0 55
S Dakota Sioux Falls 5 100.0 1 0.0 83
Tenn, E Knoxville 5 20.0 64 80.0 24
Tenn, M Nashville 5 0.0 72 100.0 1
Tenn, W Memphis 9 11.1 68 88.9 21
Texas, N Fort Worth 24 66.7 18 33.3 70
Texas, E Tyler 19 68.4 17 31.6 72
Texas, S Houston 23 47.8 36 52.2 53
Texas, W San Antonio 20 50.0 32 50.0 55
Utah Salt Lake City 9 44.4 39 55.6 50
Vermont Burlington 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
Virg, E Alexandria 19 31.6 56 68.4 33
Virg, W Roanoke 6 83.3 8 16.7 81
Wash, E Spokane 0 - - - -
Wash, W Seattle 11 72.7 15 27.3 74
W Virg, NWheeling 7 28.6 59 71.4 30
W Virg, SCharleston 13 7.7 69 92.3 20
Wisc, E Milwaukee 5 0.0 72 100.0 1
Wisc, W Madison 2 0.0 72 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 4 0.0 72 100.0 1
Note: Tax-fraud cases are defined as program category 033.


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010