Percent of IRS Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2008
Districts in Rank Order--Tax Fraud


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

Non-TaxTax-Related
DistrictCityTotal ConvictionsPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 1,124 44.3 - 55.7 -
Alaska Anchorage 2 0.0 70 100.0 1
Ark, E Little Rock 1 0.0 70 100.0 1
Cal, S San Diego 9 0.0 70 100.0 1
D. C. Washington 3 0.0 70 100.0 1
Fla, N Pensacola 2 0.0 70 100.0 1
Iowa, S Des Moines 1 0.0 70 100.0 1
La, E New Orleans 6 0.0 70 100.0 1
La, M Baton Rouge 5 0.0 70 100.0 1
La, W Shreveport 3 0.0 70 100.0 1
Mo, W Kansas City 10 0.0 70 100.0 1
N Car, W Asheville 8 0.0 70 100.0 1
N Dakota Fargo 3 0.0 70 100.0 1
N Mexico Albuquerque 1 0.0 70 100.0 1
Nebraska Omaha 2 0.0 70 100.0 1
Tenn, M Nashville 4 0.0 70 100.0 1
W Virg, NWheeling 5 0.0 70 100.0 1
Cal, C Los Angeles 35 8.6 69 91.4 17
Kansas Topeka 7 14.3 68 85.7 18
Ga, M Macon 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Ga, S Savannah 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Ken, W Louisville 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Montana Billings 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Penn, M Scranton 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Tenn, W Memphis 6 16.7 62 83.3 19
Fla, M Tampa 28 17.9 61 82.1 25
Colorado Denver 5 20.0 58 80.0 26
Ken, E Lexington 5 20.0 58 80.0 26
R. I. Providence 5 20.0 58 80.0 26
N. J. Newark 44 20.5 57 79.5 29
Penn, E Philadelphia 34 20.6 56 79.4 30
Miss, S Jackson 9 22.2 55 77.8 31
N. Y., S Manhattan 17 23.5 54 76.5 32
Tenn, E Knoxville 8 25.0 52 75.0 33
Virg, E Alexandria 12 25.0 52 75.0 33
Mich, E Detroit 22 27.3 51 72.7 35
Ala, N Birmingham 7 28.6 50 71.4 36
Wash, W Seattle 16 31.3 49 68.8 37
Okla, N Tulsa 6 33.3 48 66.7 38
Mass Boston 20 35.0 47 65.0 39
N. Y., N Syracuse 11 36.4 46 63.6 40
Penn, W Pittsburgh 33 39.4 45 60.6 41
Cal, E Sacramento 40 40.0 42 60.0 42
Delaware Wilmington 5 40.0 42 60.0 42
Wisc, W Madison 5 40.0 42 60.0 42
S Car Columbia 17 41.2 41 58.8 45
Nevada Las Vegas 12 41.7 39 58.3 46
Texas, S Houston 12 41.7 39 58.3 46
MinnesotaMinneapolis 37 43.2 38 56.8 48
N. Y., W Buffalo 11 45.5 37 54.5 49
Wisc, E Milwaukee 17 47.1 36 52.9 50
Ala, M Montgomery 2 50.0 33 50.0 51
Conn New Haven 18 50.0 33 50.0 51
Ohio, N Cleveland 28 50.0 33 50.0 51
Maryland Baltimore 23 52.2 32 47.8 54
Ill, N Chicago 34 52.9 31 47.1 55
Oregon Portland 24 54.2 30 45.8 56
Fla, S Miami 44 59.1 29 40.9 57
Ohio, S Cincinnati 32 59.4 28 40.6 58
Arizona Phoenix 10 60.0 24 40.0 59
Ark, W Fort Smith 5 60.0 24 40.0 59
Hawaii Honolulu 5 60.0 24 40.0 59
Texas, N Fort Worth 40 60.0 24 40.0 59
Ind, N South Bend 13 61.5 23 38.5 63
Utah Salt Lake City 21 61.9 22 38.1 64
Ill, S East St. Louis 8 62.5 19 37.5 65
N. Y., E Brooklyn 16 62.5 19 37.5 65
W Virg, SCharleston 8 62.5 19 37.5 65
Cal, N San Francisco 48 66.7 14 33.3 68
Idaho Boise 3 66.7 14 33.3 68
Ill, C Springfield 3 66.7 14 33.3 68
Ind, S Indianapolis 9 66.7 14 33.3 68
Maine Portland 3 66.7 14 33.3 68
Okla, W Oklahoma City 7 71.4 13 28.6 73
Ga, N Atlanta 37 73.0 12 27.0 74
N Car, M Greensboro 4 75.0 11 25.0 75
Texas, W San Antonio 21 76.2 10 23.8 76
Mich, W Grand Rapids 9 77.8 9 22.2 77
S Dakota Sioux Falls 5 80.0 8 20.0 78
N Car, E Raleigh 24 83.3 6 16.7 79
Texas, E Tyler 12 83.3 6 16.7 79
Mo, E St. Louis 13 84.6 5 15.4 81
Virg, W Roanoke 7 85.7 4 14.3 82
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
New Hamp Concord 3 100.0 1 0.0 83
Vermont Burlington 1 100.0 1 0.0 83
Ala, S Mobile 0 - - - -
Miss, N Oxford 0 - - - -
Okla, E Muskogee 0 - - - -
Wash, E Spokane 0 - - - -
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 - - - -
Note: Tax-fraud cases are defined as program category 033.

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010