Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 38,775 35,323 33,363 86.0 -
Ala, N Birmingham 17 13 13 76.5 43
Ala, M Montgomery 0 0 0 - -
Ala, S Mobile 2 2 2 100.0 1
Alaska Anchorage 12 8 7 58.3 67
Arizona Phoenix 4,288 3,768 3,666 85.5 27
Ark, E Little Rock 28 26 24 85.7 26
Ark, W Fort Smith 104 92 80 76.9 42
Cal, N San Francisco 191 156 144 75.4 46
Cal, C Los Angeles 986 899 802 81.3 35
Cal, E Sacramento 168 163 153 91.1 10
Cal, S San Diego 1,869 1,829 1,565 83.7 31
Colorado Denver 167 149 136 81.4 34
Conn New Haven 28 8 7 25.0 85
Delaware Wilmington 19 18 17 89.5 15
D. C. Washington 5 5 2 40.0 77
Fla, N Pensacola 13 10 9 69.2 55
Fla, M Tampa 535 446 423 79.1 39
Fla, S Miami 638 516 487 76.3 45
Ga, N Atlanta 185 164 149 80.5 36
Ga, M Macon 9 9 8 88.9 17
Ga, S Savannah 0 0 0 - -
Hawaii Honolulu 15 11 7 46.7 73
Idaho Boise 95 70 59 62.1 64
Ill, N Chicago 127 102 91 71.7 52
Ill, S East St. Louis 20 18 17 85.0 28
Ill, C Springfield 25 24 22 88.0 21
Ind, N South Bend 12 5 5 41.7 75
Ind, S Indianapolis 14 11 11 78.6 41
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 96 85 83 86.5 23
Iowa, S Des Moines 110 101 98 89.1 16
Kansas Topeka 123 114 109 88.6 19
Ken, E Lexington 55 41 32 58.2 68
Ken, W Louisville 35 17 14 40.0 77
La, E New Orleans 64 15 11 17.2 87
La, M Baton Rouge 6 2 2 33.3 81
La, W Shreveport 17 13 11 64.7 62
Maine Portland 51 44 41 80.4 37
Maryland Baltimore 29 21 21 72.4 51
Mass Boston 58 47 40 69.0 56
Mich, E Detroit 148 128 72 48.6 72
Mich, W Grand Rapids 69 63 61 88.4 20
MinnesotaMinneapolis 27 25 24 88.9 17
Miss, N Oxford 4 0 0 0.0 88
Miss, S Jackson 32 29 24 75.0 47
Mo, E St. Louis 47 41 41 87.2 22
Mo, W Kansas City 85 45 37 43.5 74
Montana Billings 64 43 36 56.3 69
Nebraska Omaha 82 74 69 84.1 30
Nevada Las Vegas 121 113 102 84.3 29
New Hamp Concord 22 13 9 40.9 76
N. J. Newark 148 127 113 76.4 44
N Mexico Albuquerque 1,810 1,741 1,666 92.0 6
N. Y., N Syracuse 212 182 167 78.8 40
N. Y., E Brooklyn 109 97 78 71.6 53
N. Y., S Manhattan 262 179 153 58.4 66
N. Y., W Buffalo 225 144 137 60.9 65
N Car, E Raleigh 41 37 37 90.2 14
N Car, M Greensboro 100 96 82 82.0 33
N Car, W Asheville 45 32 22 48.9 71
N Dakota Fargo 100 96 95 95.0 4
Ohio, N Cleveland 59 54 54 91.5 7
Ohio, S Cincinnati 44 23 22 50.0 70
Okla, N Tulsa 5 2 2 40.0 77
Okla, E Muskogee 3 2 1 33.3 81
Okla, W Oklahoma City 13 4 4 30.8 84
Oregon Portland 187 178 171 91.4 8
Penn, E Philadelphia 109 88 80 73.4 48
Penn, M Scranton 53 39 35 66.0 61
Penn, W Pittsburgh 34 27 24 70.6 54
R. I. Providence 24 17 16 66.7 59
S Car Columbia 41 35 28 68.3 57
S Dakota Sioux Falls 53 52 48 90.6 11
Tenn, E Knoxville 49 33 33 67.3 58
Tenn, M Nashville 41 33 30 73.2 49
Tenn, W Memphis 11 9 8 72.7 50
Texas, N Fort Worth 282 255 243 86.2 24
Texas, E Tyler 91 79 75 82.4 32
Texas, S Houston 19,157 17,940 17,307 90.3 12
Texas, W San Antonio 3,195 3,103 2,885 90.3 12
Utah Salt Lake City 233 230 213 91.4 8
Vermont Burlington 75 63 48 64.0 63
Virg, E Alexandria 142 132 122 85.9 25
Virg, W Roanoke 6 6 6 100.0 1
Wash, E Spokane 248 125 98 39.5 80
Wash, W Seattle 159 136 127 79.9 38
W Virg, NWheeling 3 1 1 33.3 81
W Virg, SCharleston 4 2 1 25.0 85
Wisc, E Milwaukee 34 33 32 94.1 5
Wisc, W Madison 9 6 6 66.7 59
Wyoming Cheyenne 22 22 22 100.0 1
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006