Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2002
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 17,164 15,694 14,277 83.2 -
Ark, E Little Rock 8 8 8 100.0 1
Ill, S East St. Louis 17 17 17 100.0 1
La, E New Orleans 28 28 28 100.0 1
Okla, N Tulsa 4 4 4 100.0 1
Wisc, W Madison 3 3 3 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 8 8 8 100.0 1
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 51 50 50 98.0 7
Arizona Phoenix 1,842 1,829 1,731 94.0 8
R. I. Providence 33 31 31 93.9 9
Miss, S Jackson 16 16 15 93.8 10
N Dakota Fargo 32 30 30 93.8 10
Oregon Portland 251 243 233 92.8 12
N Mexico Albuquerque 1,328 1,302 1,227 92.4 13
Conn New Haven 11 10 10 90.9 14
Nevada Las Vegas 204 190 185 90.7 15
Cal, E Sacramento 369 358 334 90.5 16
Texas, W San Antonio 2,720 2,649 2,458 90.4 17
Ill, C Springfield 29 28 26 89.7 18
Mass Boston 45 42 40 88.9 19
Ill, N Chicago 116 108 103 88.8 20
Ark, W Fort Smith 34 31 30 88.2 21
Ga, S Savannah 8 7 7 87.5 22
S Dakota Sioux Falls 16 16 14 87.5 22
Iowa, S Des Moines 71 63 62 87.3 24
Utah Salt Lake City 230 224 200 87.0 25
Mo, E St. Louis 45 43 39 86.7 26
Mich, W Grand Rapids 49 43 42 85.7 27
Kansas Topeka 55 50 47 85.5 28
N Car, M Greensboro 48 45 41 85.4 29
Texas, S Houston 2,502 2,377 2,122 84.8 30
Maine Portland 57 48 48 84.2 31
S Car Columbia 31 30 26 83.9 32
Ga, M Macon 12 10 10 83.3 33
Cal, S San Diego 2,126 2,099 1,766 83.1 34
Wash, W Seattle 115 104 95 82.6 35
N. Y., E Brooklyn 128 123 105 82.0 36
La, W Shreveport 11 9 9 81.8 37
MinnesotaMinneapolis 22 18 18 81.8 37
N. Y., N Syracuse 172 147 140 81.4 39
Okla, W Oklahoma City 16 13 13 81.3 40
Ala, S Mobile 5 4 4 80.0 41
Miss, N Oxford 5 4 4 80.0 41
Penn, E Philadelphia 82 68 65 79.3 43
Penn, W Pittsburgh 14 11 11 78.6 44
Cal, C Los Angeles 581 545 456 78.5 45
Ga, N Atlanta 203 181 157 77.3 46
Texas, N Fort Worth 327 262 248 75.8 47
Cal, N San Francisco 172 145 130 75.6 48
N Car, W Asheville 86 66 65 75.6 48
La, M Baton Rouge 8 7 6 75.0 50
Virg, E Alexandria 88 76 66 75.0 50
Alaska Anchorage 15 13 11 73.3 52
Fla, M Tampa 183 143 134 73.2 53
Ala, N Birmingham 11 8 8 72.7 54
Fla, S Miami 281 221 203 72.2 55
Tenn, M Nashville 18 13 13 72.2 55
Vermont Burlington 27 23 19 70.4 57
Idaho Boise 62 45 43 69.4 58
Nebraska Omaha 64 52 44 68.8 59
Texas, E Tyler 64 44 43 67.2 60
D. C. Washington 27 18 18 66.7 61
Montana Billings 29 23 19 65.5 62
N Car, E Raleigh 31 20 20 64.5 63
N. Y., S Manhattan 244 173 157 64.3 64
Tenn, W Memphis 14 10 9 64.3 64
Maryland Baltimore 44 30 28 63.6 66
N. J. Newark 73 49 45 61.6 67
Colorado Denver 98 66 60 61.2 68
Tenn, E Knoxville 59 37 36 61.0 69
Penn, M Scranton 29 19 17 58.6 70
Ken, E Lexington 26 18 15 57.7 71
Wisc, E Milwaukee 7 4 4 57.1 72
Delaware Wilmington 9 7 5 55.6 73
New Hamp Concord 9 5 5 55.6 73
Mich, E Detroit 75 51 41 54.7 75
N. Y., W Buffalo 178 113 97 54.5 76
Wash, E Spokane 215 131 114 53.0 77
Ind, S Indianapolis 21 16 11 52.4 78
Fla, N Pensacola 2 1 1 50.0 79
W Virg, NWheeling 2 2 1 50.0 79
Mo, W Kansas City 55 27 25 45.5 81
Ken, W Louisville 27 13 12 44.4 82
Virg, W Roanoke 7 5 3 42.9 83
Hawaii Honolulu 27 13 11 40.7 84
Ind, N South Bend 9 6 3 33.3 85
Ohio, N Cleveland 61 19 19 31.1 86
Ohio, S Cincinnati 78 3 2 2.6 87
Okla, E Muskogee 1 0 0 0.0 88
W Virg, SCharleston 1 1 0 0.0 88
Ala, M Montgomery 0 0 0 - -
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006