Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2002
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 17,164 15,694 14,277 83.2 -
Ala, N Birmingham 11 8 8 72.7 54
Ala, M Montgomery 0 0 0 - -
Ala, S Mobile 5 4 4 80.0 41
Alaska Anchorage 15 13 11 73.3 52
Arizona Phoenix 1,842 1,829 1,731 94.0 8
Ark, E Little Rock 8 8 8 100.0 1
Ark, W Fort Smith 34 31 30 88.2 21
Cal, N San Francisco 172 145 130 75.6 48
Cal, C Los Angeles 581 545 456 78.5 45
Cal, E Sacramento 369 358 334 90.5 16
Cal, S San Diego 2,126 2,099 1,766 83.1 34
Colorado Denver 98 66 60 61.2 68
Conn New Haven 11 10 10 90.9 14
Delaware Wilmington 9 7 5 55.6 73
D. C. Washington 27 18 18 66.7 61
Fla, N Pensacola 2 1 1 50.0 79
Fla, M Tampa 183 143 134 73.2 53
Fla, S Miami 281 221 203 72.2 55
Ga, N Atlanta 203 181 157 77.3 46
Ga, M Macon 12 10 10 83.3 33
Ga, S Savannah 8 7 7 87.5 22
Hawaii Honolulu 27 13 11 40.7 84
Idaho Boise 62 45 43 69.4 58
Ill, N Chicago 116 108 103 88.8 20
Ill, S East St. Louis 17 17 17 100.0 1
Ill, C Springfield 29 28 26 89.7 18
Ind, N South Bend 9 6 3 33.3 85
Ind, S Indianapolis 21 16 11 52.4 78
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 51 50 50 98.0 7
Iowa, S Des Moines 71 63 62 87.3 24
Kansas Topeka 55 50 47 85.5 28
Ken, E Lexington 26 18 15 57.7 71
Ken, W Louisville 27 13 12 44.4 82
La, E New Orleans 28 28 28 100.0 1
La, M Baton Rouge 8 7 6 75.0 50
La, W Shreveport 11 9 9 81.8 37
Maine Portland 57 48 48 84.2 31
Maryland Baltimore 44 30 28 63.6 66
Mass Boston 45 42 40 88.9 19
Mich, E Detroit 75 51 41 54.7 75
Mich, W Grand Rapids 49 43 42 85.7 27
MinnesotaMinneapolis 22 18 18 81.8 37
Miss, N Oxford 5 4 4 80.0 41
Miss, S Jackson 16 16 15 93.8 10
Mo, E St. Louis 45 43 39 86.7 26
Mo, W Kansas City 55 27 25 45.5 81
Montana Billings 29 23 19 65.5 62
Nebraska Omaha 64 52 44 68.8 59
Nevada Las Vegas 204 190 185 90.7 15
New Hamp Concord 9 5 5 55.6 73
N. J. Newark 73 49 45 61.6 67
N Mexico Albuquerque 1,328 1,302 1,227 92.4 13
N. Y., N Syracuse 172 147 140 81.4 39
N. Y., E Brooklyn 128 123 105 82.0 36
N. Y., S Manhattan 244 173 157 64.3 64
N. Y., W Buffalo 178 113 97 54.5 76
N Car, E Raleigh 31 20 20 64.5 63
N Car, M Greensboro 48 45 41 85.4 29
N Car, W Asheville 86 66 65 75.6 48
N Dakota Fargo 32 30 30 93.8 10
Ohio, N Cleveland 61 19 19 31.1 86
Ohio, S Cincinnati 78 3 2 2.6 87
Okla, N Tulsa 4 4 4 100.0 1
Okla, E Muskogee 1 0 0 0.0 88
Okla, W Oklahoma City 16 13 13 81.3 40
Oregon Portland 251 243 233 92.8 12
Penn, E Philadelphia 82 68 65 79.3 43
Penn, M Scranton 29 19 17 58.6 70
Penn, W Pittsburgh 14 11 11 78.6 44
R. I. Providence 33 31 31 93.9 9
S Car Columbia 31 30 26 83.9 32
S Dakota Sioux Falls 16 16 14 87.5 22
Tenn, E Knoxville 59 37 36 61.0 69
Tenn, M Nashville 18 13 13 72.2 55
Tenn, W Memphis 14 10 9 64.3 64
Texas, N Fort Worth 327 262 248 75.8 47
Texas, E Tyler 64 44 43 67.2 60
Texas, S Houston 2,502 2,377 2,122 84.8 30
Texas, W San Antonio 2,720 2,649 2,458 90.4 17
Utah Salt Lake City 230 224 200 87.0 25
Vermont Burlington 27 23 19 70.4 57
Virg, E Alexandria 88 76 66 75.0 50
Virg, W Roanoke 7 5 3 42.9 83
Wash, E Spokane 215 131 114 53.0 77
Wash, W Seattle 115 104 95 82.6 35
W Virg, NWheeling 2 2 1 50.0 79
W Virg, SCharleston 1 1 0 0.0 88
Wisc, E Milwaukee 7 4 4 57.1 72
Wisc, W Madison 3 3 3 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 8 8 8 100.0 1
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006