Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2001
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 17,622 16,298 14,452 82.0 -
Ala, N Birmingham 9 9 8 88.9 19
Ala, M Montgomery 1 1 1 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 0 0 0 - -
Alaska Anchorage 15 12 11 73.3 56
Arizona Phoenix 2,026 2,015 1,845 91.1 15
Ark, E Little Rock 6 6 4 66.7 63
Ark, W Fort Smith 70 62 62 88.6 22
Cal, N San Francisco 337 310 280 83.1 29
Cal, C Los Angeles 462 380 299 64.7 68
Cal, E Sacramento 416 410 390 93.8 11
Cal, S San Diego 2,570 2,562 1,976 76.9 48
Colorado Denver 78 47 39 50.0 77
Conn New Haven 12 12 12 100.0 1
Delaware Wilmington 8 4 4 50.0 77
D. C. Washington 26 22 17 65.4 66
Fla, N Pensacola 19 2 2 10.5 87
Fla, M Tampa 267 226 215 80.5 39
Fla, S Miami 273 225 208 76.2 51
Ga, N Atlanta 207 189 179 86.5 24
Ga, M Macon 13 11 11 84.6 27
Ga, S Savannah 14 12 11 78.6 44
Hawaii Honolulu 30 23 21 70.0 57
Idaho Boise 51 35 35 68.6 59
Ill, N Chicago 83 79 75 90.4 17
Ill, S East St. Louis 23 21 21 91.3 14
Ill, C Springfield 17 15 14 82.4 31
Ind, N South Bend 4 2 2 50.0 77
Ind, S Indianapolis 6 5 4 66.7 63
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 52 48 47 90.4 17
Iowa, S Des Moines 63 57 52 82.5 30
Kansas Topeka 73 63 59 80.8 37
Ken, E Lexington 63 43 26 41.3 83
Ken, W Louisville 33 15 15 45.5 82
La, E New Orleans 17 13 13 76.5 49
La, M Baton Rouge 1 1 1 100.0 1
La, W Shreveport 3 3 3 100.0 1
Maine Portland 50 37 34 68.0 60
Maryland Baltimore 36 19 19 52.8 75
Mass Boston 46 43 31 67.4 62
Mich, E Detroit 44 37 28 63.6 69
Mich, W Grand Rapids 48 42 39 81.3 36
MinnesotaMinneapolis 29 19 19 65.5 65
Miss, N Oxford 2 2 2 100.0 1
Miss, S Jackson 15 9 9 60.0 72
Mo, E St. Louis 20 17 17 85.0 26
Mo, W Kansas City 35 28 20 57.1 74
Montana Billings 28 23 23 82.1 33
Nebraska Omaha 93 68 63 67.7 61
Nevada Las Vegas 226 205 182 80.5 39
New Hamp Concord 13 9 9 69.2 58
N. J. Newark 60 42 39 65.0 67
N Mexico Albuquerque 958 931 867 90.5 16
N. Y., N Syracuse 211 207 199 94.3 10
N. Y., E Brooklyn 113 106 71 62.8 70
N. Y., S Manhattan 238 210 198 83.2 28
N. Y., W Buffalo 211 140 129 61.1 71
N Car, E Raleigh 11 11 11 100.0 1
N Car, M Greensboro 53 48 46 86.8 23
N Car, W Asheville 18 16 16 88.9 19
N Dakota Fargo 26 25 24 92.3 13
Ohio, N Cleveland 71 17 16 22.5 85
Ohio, S Cincinnati 38 8 8 21.1 86
Okla, N Tulsa 7 2 2 28.6 84
Okla, E Muskogee 5 0 0 0.0 89
Okla, W Oklahoma City 52 5 5 9.6 88
Oregon Portland 274 270 255 93.1 12
Penn, E Philadelphia 69 56 52 75.4 52
Penn, M Scranton 18 9 9 50.0 77
Penn, W Pittsburgh 5 4 4 80.0 41
R. I. Providence 33 27 26 78.8 43
S Car Columbia 33 30 27 81.8 34
S Dakota Sioux Falls 37 34 18 48.6 81
Tenn, E Knoxville 23 20 18 78.3 46
Tenn, M Nashville 17 13 13 76.5 49
Tenn, W Memphis 31 25 25 80.6 38
Texas, N Fort Worth 270 226 212 78.5 45
Texas, E Tyler 66 54 54 81.8 34
Texas, S Houston 1,855 1,828 1,600 86.3 25
Texas, W San Antonio 3,310 3,238 2,941 88.9 19
Utah Salt Lake City 198 194 187 94.4 9
Vermont Burlington 19 17 15 78.9 42
Virg, E Alexandria 45 38 37 82.2 32
Virg, W Roanoke 4 3 3 75.0 54
Wash, E Spokane 246 146 128 52.0 76
Wash, W Seattle 101 80 76 75.2 53
W Virg, NWheeling 3 3 3 100.0 1
W Virg, SCharleston 9 9 7 77.8 47
Wisc, E Milwaukee 5 4 3 60.0 72
Wisc, W Madison 3 3 3 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 20 18 15 75.0 54
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006