Percent of DEA Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2006
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 20,997 17,134 14,855 70.7 -
MinnesotaMinneapolis 238 234 226 95.0 1
La, E New Orleans 112 106 101 90.2 2
N Car, W Asheville 179 169 159 88.8 3
S Car Columbia 334 301 283 84.7 4
Texas, W San Antonio 1,045 961 879 84.1 5
Ohio, N Cleveland 272 246 221 81.3 6
Wash, W Seattle 311 280 252 81.0 7
Okla, W Oklahoma City 26 22 21 80.8 8
Ala, S Mobile 180 156 145 80.6 9
Delaware Wilmington 41 35 33 80.5 10
N. Y., S Manhattan 810 734 652 80.5 10
Utah Salt Lake City 163 159 131 80.4 12
Conn New Haven 132 121 106 80.3 13
Texas, S Houston 951 869 759 79.8 14
Tenn, M Nashville 103 85 82 79.6 15
Virg, E Alexandria 562 480 446 79.4 16
Nevada Las Vegas 123 109 97 78.9 17
N Mexico Albuquerque 656 604 517 78.8 18
Virg, W Roanoke 287 249 226 78.7 19
Alaska Anchorage 46 38 36 78.3 20
Colorado Denver 168 147 130 77.4 21
Wyoming Cheyenne 53 47 41 77.4 21
Kansas Topeka 233 205 179 76.8 23
S Dakota Sioux Falls 85 65 65 76.5 24
N. Y., E Brooklyn 237 216 180 75.9 25
Hawaii Honolulu 218 201 165 75.7 26
Vermont Burlington 81 66 61 75.3 27
Penn, M Scranton 222 188 167 75.2 28
Ind, N South Bend 83 68 62 74.7 29
N Car, M Greensboro 95 79 71 74.7 29
Penn, W Pittsburgh 142 113 106 74.6 31
Miss, S Jackson 112 102 83 74.1 32
Ill, S East St. Louis 127 101 94 74.0 33
Fla, S Miami 759 644 561 73.9 34
Ohio, S Cincinnati 202 180 149 73.8 35
Ala, M Montgomery 41 37 30 73.2 36
Ill, C Springfield 122 107 89 73.0 37
Wash, E Spokane 153 132 111 72.5 38
Tenn, W Memphis 130 108 94 72.3 39
Ga, S Savannah 115 94 83 72.2 40
N. J. Newark 269 240 192 71.4 41
Fla, N Pensacola 306 245 216 70.6 42
N Car, E Raleigh 125 89 88 70.4 43
Maryland Baltimore 261 205 183 70.1 44
Wisc, E Milwaukee 111 89 77 69.4 45
Mich, E Detroit 299 263 207 69.2 46
Fla, M Tampa 978 729 671 68.6 47
Ala, N Birmingham 213 170 146 68.5 48
Arizona Phoenix 1,163 871 797 68.5 48
Mo, E St. Louis 402 295 274 68.2 50
La, W Shreveport 154 110 104 67.5 51
Mich, W Grand Rapids 123 109 83 67.5 51
Texas, N Fort Worth 304 240 202 66.4 53
Cal, E Sacramento 271 238 179 66.1 54
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 122 96 80 65.6 55
Iowa, S Des Moines 281 208 184 65.5 56
Oregon Portland 173 137 113 65.3 57
Nebraska Omaha 106 80 69 65.1 58
N. Y., W Buffalo 215 204 140 65.1 58
Ind, S Indianapolis 205 170 133 64.9 60
Mass Boston 211 148 137 64.9 60
Cal, C Los Angeles 389 358 242 62.2 62
Penn, E Philadelphia 258 173 159 61.6 63
Texas, E Tyler 271 193 167 61.6 63
N Dakota Fargo 80 52 49 61.3 65
Maine Portland 98 70 59 60.2 66
Ga, N Atlanta 222 181 133 59.9 67
Ken, E Lexington 301 223 179 59.5 68
New Hamp Concord 69 66 41 59.4 69
Okla, N Tulsa 41 31 24 58.5 70
Cal, S San Diego 264 230 154 58.3 71
Ill, N Chicago 384 276 224 58.3 71
Wisc, W Madison 24 20 14 58.3 71
Ken, W Louisville 123 78 71 57.7 74
W Virg, NWheeling 61 48 34 55.7 75
D. C. Washington 49 28 27 55.1 76
N. Y., N Syracuse 158 110 84 53.2 77
Tenn, E Knoxville 278 166 148 53.2 77
Mo, W Kansas City 207 120 110 53.1 79
Cal, N San Francisco 168 125 89 53.0 80
Ark, E Little Rock 164 103 84 51.2 81
Miss, N Oxford 125 65 61 48.8 82
Ark, W Fort Smith 66 39 32 48.5 83
Okla, E Muskogee 25 16 12 48.0 84
Montana Billings 103 58 49 47.6 85
La, M Baton Rouge 40 24 19 47.5 86
Idaho Boise 114 66 51 44.7 87
R. I. Providence 64 29 28 43.8 88
Ga, M Macon 218 104 95 43.6 89
W Virg, SCharleston 92 38 34 37.0 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009