Percent of DEA Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 20,475 16,476 14,016 68.5 -
Mich, W Grand Rapids 96 93 87 90.6 1
MinnesotaMinneapolis 169 161 153 90.5 2
S Dakota Sioux Falls 85 79 76 89.4 3
Conn New Haven 147 135 128 87.1 4
Texas, W San Antonio 1,160 1,091 992 85.5 5
Utah Salt Lake City 110 105 94 85.5 5
Virg, W Roanoke 255 223 216 84.7 7
Virg, E Alexandria 675 599 571 84.6 8
Penn, M Scranton 215 201 179 83.3 9
Wisc, W Madison 41 40 34 82.9 10
N Car, W Asheville 107 94 87 81.3 11
Wash, W Seattle 247 214 199 80.6 12
Miss, N Oxford 75 63 60 80.0 13
Wyoming Cheyenne 79 68 63 79.7 14
S Car Columbia 326 290 259 79.4 15
N Car, M Greensboro 101 91 79 78.2 16
La, E New Orleans 130 104 100 76.9 17
Alaska Anchorage 73 66 56 76.7 18
Mo, E St. Louis 361 294 277 76.7 18
Kansas Topeka 240 211 182 75.8 20
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 124 98 93 75.0 21
Ga, S Savannah 143 122 107 74.8 22
Ill, C Springfield 123 98 92 74.8 22
Penn, W Pittsburgh 138 108 103 74.6 24
Arizona Phoenix 521 439 388 74.5 25
Ind, S Indianapolis 189 172 140 74.1 26
Wisc, E Milwaukee 104 95 77 74.0 27
Ohio, N Cleveland 260 216 190 73.1 28
Nebraska Omaha 152 119 111 73.0 29
Nevada Las Vegas 141 123 102 72.3 30
Tenn, M Nashville 148 127 106 71.6 31
Ala, S Mobile 118 86 84 71.2 32
Fla, M Tampa 961 732 684 71.2 32
Okla, E Muskogee 38 31 27 71.1 34
La, W Shreveport 116 89 82 70.7 35
Wash, E Spokane 226 185 159 70.4 36
Miss, S Jackson 182 161 128 70.3 37
Ala, N Birmingham 168 144 118 70.2 38
Ken, W Louisville 116 85 81 69.8 39
Ohio, S Cincinnati 218 171 152 69.7 40
Colorado Denver 173 157 120 69.4 41
Fla, S Miami 727 577 503 69.2 42
Maryland Baltimore 279 226 193 69.2 42
Okla, W Oklahoma City 29 26 20 69.0 44
Mich, E Detroit 243 219 167 68.7 45
Tenn, E Knoxville 291 230 200 68.7 45
Ind, N South Bend 118 89 81 68.6 47
Texas, S Houston 1,135 939 769 67.8 48
N Mexico Albuquerque 628 537 424 67.5 49
N. Y., E Brooklyn 225 193 151 67.1 50
Texas, E Tyler 269 213 180 66.9 51
La, M Baton Rouge 79 55 52 65.8 52
N. J. Newark 315 275 207 65.7 53
Iowa, S Des Moines 249 174 163 65.5 54
Cal, S San Diego 256 230 165 64.5 55
Hawaii Honolulu 166 141 106 63.9 56
Cal, E Sacramento 265 228 167 63.0 57
Ark, W Fort Smith 80 60 50 62.5 58
N. Y., S Manhattan 606 483 378 62.4 59
N. Y., W Buffalo 265 226 165 62.3 60
N Dakota Fargo 63 44 39 61.9 61
Oregon Portland 220 187 136 61.8 62
Fla, N Pensacola 262 168 160 61.1 63
N Car, E Raleigh 165 104 100 60.6 64
Ill, S East St. Louis 148 94 89 60.1 65
Ga, N Atlanta 233 196 139 59.7 66
Vermont Burlington 100 70 59 59.0 67
Maine Portland 112 81 66 58.9 68
Texas, N Fort Worth 331 250 194 58.6 69
Ken, E Lexington 269 183 156 58.0 70
Mo, W Kansas City 212 137 123 58.0 70
Ga, M Macon 167 111 95 56.9 72
Ill, N Chicago 237 161 134 56.5 73
Penn, E Philadelphia 246 158 137 55.7 74
Mass Boston 222 132 123 55.4 75
New Hamp Concord 65 57 36 55.4 75
D. C. Washington 48 26 26 54.2 77
Montana Billings 75 47 39 52.0 78
Okla, N Tulsa 62 38 32 51.6 79
W Virg, SCharleston 97 53 50 51.5 80
Cal, N San Francisco 123 91 63 51.2 81
N. Y., N Syracuse 160 100 80 50.0 82
Cal, C Los Angeles 509 451 253 49.7 83
W Virg, NWheeling 69 38 34 49.3 84
Tenn, W Memphis 310 169 147 47.4 85
Ala, M Montgomery 67 51 31 46.3 86
Ark, E Little Rock 148 72 66 44.6 87
Idaho Boise 85 55 33 38.8 88
Delaware Wilmington 46 22 17 37.0 89
R. I. Providence 84 33 29 34.5 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009