Percent of DEA Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2004
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 20,207 16,020 13,652 67.6 -
Ill, C Springfield 87 86 81 93.1 1
Mich, W Grand Rapids 87 85 79 90.8 2
MinnesotaMinneapolis 174 162 150 86.2 3
Virg, E Alexandria 667 599 572 85.8 4
S Car Columbia 315 296 267 84.8 5
S Dakota Sioux Falls 77 70 64 83.1 6
Arizona Phoenix 612 549 494 80.7 7
Penn, M Scranton 197 188 159 80.7 7
Texas, W San Antonio 1,192 1,083 955 80.1 9
La, E New Orleans 120 102 96 80.0 10
Mo, E St. Louis 259 216 205 79.2 11
Miss, S Jackson 170 154 132 77.6 12
Penn, W Pittsburgh 161 130 125 77.6 12
Texas, E Tyler 266 221 204 76.7 14
Maine Portland 111 99 85 76.6 15
Tenn, M Nashville 124 106 95 76.6 15
Wisc, W Madison 34 29 26 76.5 17
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 216 169 165 76.4 18
Nebraska Omaha 148 120 113 76.4 18
N Car, W Asheville 76 68 58 76.3 20
Cal, E Sacramento 261 231 196 75.1 21
Virg, W Roanoke 265 222 199 75.1 21
Conn New Haven 164 151 123 75.0 23
Ala, N Birmingham 151 128 113 74.8 24
Vermont Burlington 90 81 67 74.4 25
La, W Shreveport 97 79 72 74.2 26
D. C. Washington 41 35 30 73.2 27
Okla, W Oklahoma City 67 61 49 73.1 28
Fla, N Pensacola 310 237 226 72.9 29
Ark, W Fort Smith 80 71 58 72.5 30
N Mexico Albuquerque 502 422 364 72.5 30
Wyoming Cheyenne 51 46 37 72.5 30
Ill, S East St. Louis 196 145 142 72.4 33
Fla, M Tampa 1,038 817 748 72.1 34
Kansas Topeka 245 201 175 71.4 35
Ohio, N Cleveland 199 143 142 71.4 35
Alaska Anchorage 104 89 74 71.2 37
Ala, S Mobile 152 112 108 71.1 38
Ind, S Indianapolis 196 147 139 70.9 39
Tenn, E Knoxville 252 200 178 70.6 40
Ill, N Chicago 263 216 185 70.3 41
Wash, E Spokane 161 134 113 70.2 42
Fla, S Miami 741 615 518 69.9 43
Ohio, S Cincinnati 152 129 105 69.1 44
Penn, E Philadelphia 313 236 216 69.0 45
Ga, S Savannah 103 83 71 68.9 46
N Car, M Greensboro 51 40 35 68.6 47
New Hamp Concord 79 66 54 68.4 48
Utah Salt Lake City 122 100 83 68.0 49
Ken, E Lexington 238 193 160 67.2 50
Mass Boston 182 144 120 65.9 51
Hawaii Honolulu 146 123 96 65.8 52
N. Y., E Brooklyn 269 237 176 65.4 53
N. Y., W Buffalo 193 153 126 65.3 54
N. Y., S Manhattan 569 456 369 64.9 55
Ken, W Louisville 82 60 53 64.6 56
Mich, E Detroit 247 220 156 63.2 57
Ala, M Montgomery 35 30 22 62.9 58
Iowa, S Des Moines 285 190 177 62.1 59
Cal, N San Francisco 154 115 95 61.7 60
N. Y., N Syracuse 172 129 106 61.6 61
Okla, E Muskogee 41 33 25 61.0 62
Nevada Las Vegas 138 108 84 60.9 63
N. J. Newark 238 190 138 58.0 64
Texas, S Houston 1,554 1,110 902 58.0 64
Tenn, W Memphis 173 117 100 57.8 66
Ind, N South Bend 148 99 85 57.4 67
Wash, W Seattle 163 128 92 56.4 68
Wisc, E Milwaukee 98 69 55 56.1 69
N Dakota Fargo 25 18 14 56.0 70
Colorado Denver 161 131 89 55.3 71
Cal, S San Diego 226 200 124 54.9 72
Ga, M Macon 171 124 93 54.4 73
Maryland Baltimore 195 133 105 53.8 74
Miss, N Oxford 138 80 74 53.6 75
Texas, N Fort Worth 339 223 179 52.8 76
Delaware Wilmington 31 19 16 51.6 77
La, M Baton Rouge 80 47 41 51.3 78
R. I. Providence 45 24 23 51.1 79
Idaho Boise 75 46 38 50.7 80
Montana Billings 79 44 40 50.6 81
N Car, E Raleigh 159 82 80 50.3 82
W Virg, NWheeling 44 25 22 50.0 83
W Virg, SCharleston 76 41 36 47.4 84
Cal, C Los Angeles 439 395 203 46.2 85
Oregon Portland 198 121 90 45.5 86
Ga, N Atlanta 226 126 98 43.4 87
Ark, E Little Rock 173 79 68 39.3 88
Mo, W Kansas City 260 108 102 39.2 89
Okla, N Tulsa 99 32 26 26.3 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009