Percent of Customs Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2003
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 8,968 7,539 6,752 75.3 -
Ga, M Macon 6 6 6 100.0 1
Mich, W Grand Rapids 12 11 11 91.7 2
Texas, W San Antonio 1,563 1,496 1,418 90.7 3
Arizona Phoenix 1,200 1,103 1,042 86.8 4
N. Y., E Brooklyn 698 660 606 86.8 4
Kansas Topeka 7 6 6 85.7 6
Montana Billings 21 18 18 85.7 6
Cal, S San Diego 1,083 1,068 926 85.5 8
Fla, S Miami 739 630 573 77.5 9
Texas, S Houston 814 739 627 77.0 10
N. J. Newark 150 121 113 75.3 11
Penn, M Scranton 4 3 3 75.0 12
N Car, W Asheville 58 53 43 74.1 13
Virg, E Alexandria 34 24 24 70.6 14
Mo, W Kansas City 16 15 11 68.8 15
Ill, N Chicago 91 70 62 68.1 16
Maryland Baltimore 80 55 54 67.5 17
Hawaii Honolulu 48 34 32 66.7 18
Miss, S Jackson 24 18 16 66.7 18
Tenn, W Memphis 9 6 6 66.7 18
N Car, E Raleigh 20 15 13 65.0 21
N Mexico Albuquerque 322 253 209 64.9 22
Cal, E Sacramento 14 10 9 64.3 23
Cal, C Los Angeles 89 68 56 62.9 24
Mass Boston 41 29 25 61.0 25
La, M Baton Rouge 5 3 3 60.0 26
N Dakota Fargo 10 7 6 60.0 26
Penn, E Philadelphia 48 31 28 58.3 28
Delaware Wilmington 7 5 4 57.1 29
Vermont Burlington 37 26 21 56.8 30
S Car Columbia 23 14 13 56.5 31
Wash, E Spokane 16 13 9 56.3 32
Cal, N San Francisco 42 25 23 54.8 33
Wash, W Seattle 101 76 54 53.5 34
Ind, N South Bend 15 8 8 53.3 35
N. Y., S Manhattan 77 47 41 53.2 36
Fla, M Tampa 183 106 96 52.5 37
Mich, E Detroit 64 55 33 51.6 38
Ala, M Montgomery 4 2 2 50.0 39
Fla, N Pensacola 38 20 19 50.0 39
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 2 1 1 50.0 39
Iowa, S Des Moines 2 1 1 50.0 39
Ohio, N Cleveland 16 9 8 50.0 39
Okla, N Tulsa 2 2 1 50.0 39
Tenn, E Knoxville 2 1 1 50.0 39
Ga, N Atlanta 49 26 23 46.9 46
Ind, S Indianapolis 13 8 6 46.2 47
Texas, N Fort Worth 57 32 26 45.6 48
Ala, S Mobile 9 7 4 44.4 49
Texas, E Tyler 30 14 13 43.3 50
Alaska Anchorage 7 4 3 42.9 51
Conn New Haven 14 6 6 42.9 51
N. Y., N Syracuse 58 35 24 41.4 53
Ark, E Little Rock 5 2 2 40.0 54
Utah Salt Lake City 5 3 2 40.0 54
N. Y., W Buffalo 67 33 26 38.8 56
La, E New Orleans 19 7 7 36.8 57
La, W Shreveport 42 17 15 35.7 58
Ill, C Springfield 3 1 1 33.3 59
MinnesotaMinneapolis 12 4 4 33.3 59
Miss, N Oxford 3 1 1 33.3 59
N Car, M Greensboro 18 12 6 33.3 59
Wisc, W Madison 3 1 1 33.3 59
Ohio, S Cincinnati 26 11 8 30.8 64
Penn, W Pittsburgh 7 3 2 28.6 65
Oregon Portland 21 8 5 23.8 66
Colorado Denver 18 7 4 22.2 67
Tenn, M Nashville 9 3 2 22.2 67
Maine Portland 28 8 6 21.4 69
Wisc, E Milwaukee 14 5 3 21.4 69
New Hamp Concord 5 1 1 20.0 71
Mo, E St. Louis 11 2 2 18.2 72
Ken, E Lexington 7 4 1 14.3 73
Okla, W Oklahoma City 7 1 1 14.3 73
D. C. Washington 15 3 2 13.3 75
Nevada Las Vegas 16 2 2 12.5 76
Ala, N Birmingham 23 4 2 8.7 77
Ga, S Savannah 6 1 0 0.0 78
Idaho Boise 6 0 0 0.0 78
Nebraska Omaha 1 0 0 0.0 78
Okla, E Muskogee 1 0 0 0.0 78
R. I. Providence 2 0 0 0.0 78
Virg, W Roanoke 1 1 0 0.0 78
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 0 0 - -
Ill, S East St. Louis 0 0 0 - -
Ken, W Louisville 0 0 0 - -
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, NWheeling 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, SCharleston 0 0 0 - -
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 0 0 - -
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2005