Percent of Customs Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2002
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 9,189 8,031 7,178 78.1 -
Ala, N Birmingham 9 6 4 44.4 44
Ala, M Montgomery 3 2 1 33.3 59
Ala, S Mobile 10 5 4 40.0 50
Alaska Anchorage 11 3 3 27.3 68
Arizona Phoenix 881 829 772 87.6 5
Ark, E Little Rock 11 11 10 90.9 4
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 0 0 - -
Cal, N San Francisco 62 40 24 38.7 54
Cal, C Los Angeles 126 92 61 48.4 41
Cal, E Sacramento 12 4 4 33.3 59
Cal, S San Diego 1,791 1,761 1,537 85.8 6
Colorado Denver 36 20 12 33.3 59
Conn New Haven 12 11 10 83.3 11
Delaware Wilmington 9 3 1 11.1 73
D. C. Washington 29 4 3 10.3 74
Fla, N Pensacola 16 10 10 62.5 28
Fla, M Tampa 166 97 81 48.8 40
Fla, S Miami 712 656 607 85.3 8
Ga, N Atlanta 36 26 20 55.6 36
Ga, M Macon 3 1 1 33.3 59
Ga, S Savannah 2 1 0 0.0 75
Hawaii Honolulu 20 12 12 60.0 32
Idaho Boise 1 1 1 100.0 1
Ill, N Chicago 90 78 67 74.4 20
Ill, S East St. Louis 3 1 1 33.3 59
Ill, C Springfield 6 5 5 83.3 11
Ind, N South Bend 4 2 2 50.0 39
Ind, S Indianapolis 23 7 6 26.1 69
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 0 0 0 - -
Iowa, S Des Moines 0 0 0 - -
Kansas Topeka 1 1 1 100.0 1
Ken, E Lexington 4 3 3 75.0 18
Ken, W Louisville 3 2 2 66.7 24
La, E New Orleans 21 18 13 61.9 29
La, M Baton Rouge 6 2 1 16.7 70
La, W Shreveport 32 15 11 34.4 58
Maine Portland 51 30 28 54.9 37
Maryland Baltimore 68 36 27 39.7 53
Mass Boston 39 26 25 64.1 26
Mich, E Detroit 43 36 24 55.8 35
Mich, W Grand Rapids 35 28 26 74.3 21
MinnesotaMinneapolis 6 4 1 16.7 70
Miss, N Oxford 1 0 0 0.0 75
Miss, S Jackson 22 20 16 72.7 22
Mo, E St. Louis 3 2 2 66.7 24
Mo, W Kansas City 17 9 8 47.1 42
Montana Billings 13 10 7 53.8 38
Nebraska Omaha 5 4 4 80.0 14
Nevada Las Vegas 10 0 0 0.0 75
New Hamp Concord 3 0 0 0.0 75
N. J. Newark 173 141 137 79.2 16
N Mexico Albuquerque 309 271 242 78.3 17
N. Y., N Syracuse 61 37 26 42.6 48
N. Y., E Brooklyn 650 611 544 83.7 10
N. Y., S Manhattan 67 28 20 29.9 67
N. Y., W Buffalo 66 24 21 31.8 66
N Car, E Raleigh 32 13 13 40.6 49
N Car, M Greensboro 27 22 17 63.0 27
N Car, W Asheville 98 87 84 85.7 7
N Dakota Fargo 5 4 4 80.0 14
Ohio, N Cleveland 21 7 7 33.3 59
Ohio, S Cincinnati 14 6 5 35.7 56
Okla, N Tulsa 7 4 3 42.9 46
Okla, E Muskogee 1 0 0 0.0 75
Okla, W Oklahoma City 5 4 2 40.0 50
Oregon Portland 8 3 1 12.5 72
Penn, E Philadelphia 44 28 27 61.4 30
Penn, M Scranton 1 0 0 0.0 75
Penn, W Pittsburgh 5 3 2 40.0 50
R. I. Providence 6 0 0 0.0 75
S Car Columbia 31 23 19 61.3 31
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 0 0 - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 2 0 0 0.0 75
Tenn, M Nashville 3 0 0 0.0 75
Tenn, W Memphis 7 4 4 57.1 34
Texas, N Fort Worth 44 27 20 45.5 43
Texas, E Tyler 17 7 6 35.3 57
Texas, S Houston 790 745 662 83.8 9
Texas, W San Antonio 1,699 1,661 1,564 92.1 3
Utah Salt Lake City 7 5 3 42.9 46
Vermont Burlington 22 20 18 81.8 13
Virg, E Alexandria 62 38 27 43.5 45
Virg, W Roanoke 3 1 1 33.3 59
Wash, E Spokane 7 6 5 71.4 23
Wash, W Seattle 93 65 54 58.1 33
W Virg, NWheeling 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, SCharleston 0 0 0 - -
Wisc, E Milwaukee 11 6 4 36.4 55
Wisc, W Madison 4 3 3 75.0 18
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 0 0 - -
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2005