Percent of Customs Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2002
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)


Customs
(Non-drugs)
DrugsOther
DistrictCityTotal ConvictionsPercentRankPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 7,178 1.8 - 91.6 - 6.6 -
Ala, N Birmingham 4 0.0 28 75.0 37 25.0 30
Ala, M Montgomery 1 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 4 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Alaska Anchorage 3 33.3 3 33.3 57 33.3 26
Arizona Phoenix 772 2.5 22 94.8 16 2.7 60
Ark, E Little Rock 10 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 - - - - - -
Cal, N San Francisco 24 8.3 12 20.8 62 70.8 13
Cal, C Los Angeles 61 18.0 5 39.3 56 42.6 23
Cal, E Sacramento 4 0.0 28 50.0 49 50.0 17
Cal, S San Diego 1,537 0.1 27 95.1 13 4.9 55
Colorado Denver 12 0.0 28 75.0 37 25.0 30
Conn New Haven 10 0.0 28 20.0 63 80.0 9
Delaware Wilmington 1 100.0 1 0.0 65 0.0 63
D. C. Washington 3 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Fla, N Pensacola 10 0.0 28 60.0 48 40.0 25
Fla, M Tampa 81 3.7 18 91.4 19 4.9 55
Fla, S Miami 607 3.0 20 90.3 21 6.8 53
Ga, N Atlanta 20 0.0 28 90.0 22 10.0 48
Ga, M Macon 1 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Ga, S Savannah 0 - - - - - -
Hawaii Honolulu 12 0.0 28 50.0 49 50.0 17
Idaho Boise 1 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Ill, N Chicago 67 6.0 14 89.6 23 4.5 57
Ill, S East St. Louis 1 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Ill, C Springfield 5 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Ind, N South Bend 2 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Ind, S Indianapolis 6 0.0 28 66.7 45 33.3 26
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 0 - - - - - -
Iowa, S Des Moines 0 - - - - - -
Kansas Topeka 1 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Ken, E Lexington 3 0.0 28 66.7 45 33.3 26
Ken, W Louisville 2 0.0 28 50.0 49 50.0 17
La, E New Orleans 13 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
La, M Baton Rouge 1 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
La, W Shreveport 11 9.1 11 72.7 41 18.2 37
Maine Portland 28 0.0 28 82.1 31 17.9 38
Maryland Baltimore 27 0.0 28 81.5 33 18.5 35
Mass Boston 25 0.0 28 84.0 28 16.0 41
Mich, E Detroit 24 4.2 17 87.5 24 8.3 50
Mich, W Grand Rapids 26 0.0 28 92.3 17 7.7 51
MinnesotaMinneapolis 1 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Miss, N Oxford 0 - - - - - -
Miss, S Jackson 16 0.0 28 87.5 24 12.5 45
Mo, E St. Louis 2 0.0 28 50.0 49 50.0 17
Mo, W Kansas City 8 0.0 28 87.5 24 12.5 45
Montana Billings 7 14.3 7 71.4 42 14.3 43
Nebraska Omaha 4 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Nevada Las Vegas 0 - - - - - -
New Hamp Concord 0 - - - - - -
N. J. Newark 137 2.9 21 81.8 32 15.3 42
N Mexico Albuquerque 242 0.4 26 95.0 14 4.5 57
N. Y., N Syracuse 26 15.4 6 42.3 54 42.3 24
N. Y., E Brooklyn 544 3.5 19 90.4 20 6.1 54
N. Y., S Manhattan 20 0.0 28 40.0 55 60.0 16
N. Y., W Buffalo 21 14.3 7 76.2 36 9.5 49
N Car, E Raleigh 13 0.0 28 92.3 17 7.7 51
N Car, M Greensboro 17 11.8 9 76.5 35 11.8 47
N Car, W Asheville 84 1.2 23 96.4 12 2.4 61
N Dakota Fargo 4 0.0 28 25.0 60 75.0 11
Ohio, N Cleveland 7 0.0 28 85.7 27 14.3 43
Ohio, S Cincinnati 5 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Okla, N Tulsa 3 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Okla, E Muskogee 0 - - - - - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 2 50.0 2 0.0 65 50.0 17
Oregon Portland 1 0.0 28 100.0 1 0.0 63
Penn, E Philadelphia 27 7.4 13 74.1 40 18.5 35
Penn, M Scranton 0 - - - - - -
Penn, W Pittsburgh 2 0.0 28 50.0 49 50.0 17
R. I. Providence 0 - - - - - -
S Car Columbia 19 5.3 15 15.8 64 78.9 10
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 - - - - - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 0 - - - - - -
Tenn, M Nashville 0 - - - - - -
Tenn, W Memphis 4 0.0 28 75.0 37 25.0 30
Texas, N Fort Worth 20 5.0 16 70.0 44 25.0 30
Texas, E Tyler 6 0.0 28 83.3 29 16.7 39
Texas, S Houston 662 0.6 24 94.9 15 4.5 57
Texas, W San Antonio 1,564 0.5 25 98.2 11 1.3 62
Utah Salt Lake City 3 0.0 28 33.3 57 66.7 14
Vermont Burlington 18 0.0 28 83.3 29 16.7 39
Virg, E Alexandria 27 0.0 28 66.7 45 33.3 26
Virg, W Roanoke 1 0.0 28 0.0 65 100.0 1
Wash, E Spokane 5 20.0 4 80.0 34 0.0 63
Wash, W Seattle 54 9.3 10 70.4 43 20.4 34
W Virg, NWheeling 0 - - - - - -
W Virg, SCharleston 0 - - - - - -
Wisc, E Milwaukee 4 0.0 28 25.0 60 75.0 11
Wisc, W Madison 3 0.0 28 33.3 57 66.7 14
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 - - - - - -
Note: Drug cases are defined as program categories 040,045,047,05A and 05B
Customs cases are defined as program categories 062 and 063


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2005