Percent of Customs Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2001
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 9,014 7,824 6,804 75.5 -
Ala, N Birmingham 11 8 7 63.6 25
Ala, M Montgomery 2 2 1 50.0 44
Ala, S Mobile 22 12 9 40.9 59
Alaska Anchorage 9 6 4 44.4 54
Arizona Phoenix 702 662 595 84.8 8
Ark, E Little Rock 23 22 17 73.9 19
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 0 0 - -
Cal, N San Francisco 64 27 16 25.0 66
Cal, C Los Angeles 125 83 59 47.2 51
Cal, E Sacramento 8 5 5 62.5 26
Cal, S San Diego 1,961 1,932 1,568 80.0 11
Colorado Denver 19 7 6 31.6 62
Conn New Haven 19 14 14 73.7 20
Delaware Wilmington 5 4 3 60.0 28
D. C. Washington 15 4 4 26.7 65
Fla, N Pensacola 59 38 33 55.9 35
Fla, M Tampa 169 58 51 30.2 63
Fla, S Miami 829 758 696 84.0 9
Ga, N Atlanta 42 36 30 71.4 22
Ga, M Macon 4 4 3 75.0 18
Ga, S Savannah 18 16 8 44.4 54
Hawaii Honolulu 18 13 9 50.0 44
Idaho Boise 0 0 0 - -
Ill, N Chicago 77 66 48 62.3 27
Ill, S East St. Louis 0 0 0 - -
Ill, C Springfield 2 2 2 100.0 1
Ind, N South Bend 5 3 3 60.0 28
Ind, S Indianapolis 18 2 2 11.1 71
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 0 0 0 - -
Iowa, S Des Moines 2 0 0 0.0 75
Kansas Topeka 3 1 1 33.3 61
Ken, E Lexington 21 18 16 76.2 17
Ken, W Louisville 2 2 2 100.0 1
La, E New Orleans 34 21 20 58.8 32
La, M Baton Rouge 6 2 1 16.7 70
La, W Shreveport 22 6 2 9.1 72
Maine Portland 26 14 14 53.8 40
Maryland Baltimore 40 22 22 55.0 37
Mass Boston 35 29 27 77.1 15
Mich, E Detroit 67 59 29 43.3 57
Mich, W Grand Rapids 25 16 15 60.0 28
MinnesotaMinneapolis 14 8 8 57.1 34
Miss, N Oxford 4 1 1 25.0 66
Miss, S Jackson 47 38 24 51.1 43
Mo, E St. Louis 11 8 6 54.5 39
Mo, W Kansas City 22 14 13 59.1 31
Montana Billings 34 30 23 67.6 24
Nebraska Omaha 1 1 0 0.0 75
Nevada Las Vegas 7 2 2 28.6 64
New Hamp Concord 5 2 2 40.0 60
N. J. Newark 201 166 159 79.1 13
N Mexico Albuquerque 214 179 152 71.0 23
N. Y., N Syracuse 58 17 14 24.1 69
N. Y., E Brooklyn 506 491 434 85.8 6
N. Y., S Manhattan 50 40 29 58.0 33
N. Y., W Buffalo 51 21 21 41.2 58
N Car, E Raleigh 25 23 20 80.0 11
N Car, M Greensboro 21 20 18 85.7 7
N Car, W Asheville 72 68 64 88.9 5
N Dakota Fargo 11 0 0 0.0 75
Ohio, N Cleveland 36 32 29 80.6 10
Ohio, S Cincinnati 16 8 7 43.8 56
Okla, N Tulsa 4 2 1 25.0 66
Okla, E Muskogee 0 0 0 - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 1 1 1 100.0 1
Oregon Portland 14 2 1 7.1 74
Penn, E Philadelphia 45 21 21 46.7 53
Penn, M Scranton 1 0 0 0.0 75
Penn, W Pittsburgh 6 0 0 0.0 75
R. I. Providence 4 2 2 50.0 44
S Car Columbia 33 24 16 48.5 50
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 0 0 - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 2 2 1 50.0 44
Tenn, M Nashville 3 1 0 0.0 75
Tenn, W Memphis 17 14 13 76.5 16
Texas, N Fort Worth 49 25 23 46.9 52
Texas, E Tyler 13 10 7 53.8 40
Texas, S Houston 705 631 550 78.0 14
Texas, W San Antonio 1,673 1,618 1,526 91.2 4
Utah Salt Lake City 9 7 5 55.6 36
Vermont Burlington 13 8 7 53.8 40
Virg, E Alexandria 40 31 29 72.5 21
Virg, W Roanoke 5 1 0 0.0 75
Wash, E Spokane 20 11 11 55.0 37
Wash, W Seattle 107 64 52 48.6 49
W Virg, NWheeling 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, SCharleston 0 0 0 - -
Wisc, E Milwaukee 12 2 1 8.3 73
Wisc, W Madison 6 4 3 50.0 44
Wyoming Cheyenne 2 0 0 0.0 75
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2005