Percent of Customs Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2000
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 8,236 6,909 5,896 71.6 -
Ala, N Birmingham 16 12 7 43.8 47
Ala, M Montgomery 15 14 8 53.3 34
Ala, S Mobile 48 28 19 39.6 53
Alaska Anchorage 4 4 3 75.0 14
Arizona Phoenix 646 607 550 85.1 8
Ark, E Little Rock 4 3 3 75.0 14
Ark, W Fort Smith 4 4 3 75.0 14
Cal, N San Francisco 69 30 26 37.7 55
Cal, C Los Angeles 67 58 41 61.2 28
Cal, E Sacramento 21 10 6 28.6 64
Cal, S San Diego 1,744 1,717 1,421 81.5 10
Colorado Denver 36 15 12 33.3 57
Conn New Haven 22 11 11 50.0 38
Delaware Wilmington 1 0 0 0.0 78
D. C. Washington 18 9 9 50.0 38
Fla, N Pensacola 39 13 13 33.3 57
Fla, M Tampa 208 117 99 47.6 45
Fla, S Miami 628 528 459 73.1 17
Ga, N Atlanta 37 26 19 51.4 37
Ga, M Macon 6 2 2 33.3 57
Ga, S Savannah 5 2 1 20.0 72
Hawaii Honolulu 19 10 7 36.8 56
Idaho Boise 0 0 0 - -
Ill, N Chicago 107 79 70 65.4 24
Ill, S East St. Louis 2 2 2 100.0 1
Ill, C Springfield 2 1 1 50.0 38
Ind, N South Bend 2 1 1 50.0 38
Ind, S Indianapolis 13 6 3 23.1 70
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 0 0 0.0 78
Iowa, S Des Moines 0 0 0 - -
Kansas Topeka 8 7 7 87.5 6
Ken, E Lexington 7 4 4 57.1 31
Ken, W Louisville 22 10 7 31.8 63
La, E New Orleans 42 29 28 66.7 20
La, M Baton Rouge 7 5 2 28.6 64
La, W Shreveport 23 16 12 52.2 35
Maine Portland 16 12 10 62.5 26
Maryland Baltimore 64 23 18 28.1 66
Mass Boston 45 31 22 48.9 44
Mich, E Detroit 88 79 23 26.1 67
Mich, W Grand Rapids 38 35 32 84.2 9
MinnesotaMinneapolis 8 4 2 25.0 68
Miss, N Oxford 3 1 1 33.3 57
Miss, S Jackson 14 6 3 21.4 71
Mo, E St. Louis 14 9 6 42.9 49
Mo, W Kansas City 19 18 18 94.7 3
Montana Billings 53 46 38 71.7 18
Nebraska Omaha 3 2 2 66.7 20
Nevada Las Vegas 14 11 8 57.1 31
New Hamp Concord 1 0 0 0.0 78
N. J. Newark 117 93 93 79.5 12
N Mexico Albuquerque 223 187 138 61.9 27
N. Y., N Syracuse 78 31 25 32.1 62
N. Y., E Brooklyn 445 406 356 80.0 11
N. Y., S Manhattan 36 26 22 61.1 29
N. Y., W Buffalo 39 17 15 38.5 54
N Car, E Raleigh 19 12 8 42.1 51
N Car, M Greensboro 22 20 20 90.9 4
N Car, W Asheville 95 88 81 85.3 7
N Dakota Fargo 11 5 5 45.5 46
Ohio, N Cleveland 32 8 3 9.4 76
Ohio, S Cincinnati 23 14 10 43.5 48
Okla, N Tulsa 22 11 9 40.9 52
Okla, E Muskogee 0 0 0 - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 21 7 4 19.0 73
Oregon Portland 12 3 3 25.0 68
Penn, E Philadelphia 28 20 18 64.3 25
Penn, M Scranton 1 1 1 100.0 1
Penn, W Pittsburgh 12 1 1 8.3 77
R. I. Providence 1 0 0 0.0 78
S Car Columbia 58 38 30 51.7 36
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 0 0 - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 3 1 1 33.3 57
Tenn, M Nashville 6 2 1 16.7 74
Tenn, W Memphis 3 2 0 0.0 78
Texas, N Fort Worth 63 56 48 76.2 13
Texas, E Tyler 22 14 11 50.0 38
Texas, S Houston 671 561 476 70.9 19
Texas, W San Antonio 1,395 1,351 1,254 89.9 5
Utah Salt Lake City 11 7 6 54.5 33
Vermont Burlington 15 10 9 60.0 30
Virg, E Alexandria 33 24 22 66.7 20
Virg, W Roanoke 5 0 0 0.0 78
Wash, E Spokane 23 5 3 13.0 75
Wash, W Seattle 102 51 43 42.2 50
W Virg, NWheeling 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, SCharleston 3 0 0 0.0 78
Wisc, E Milwaukee 9 7 6 66.7 20
Wisc, W Madison 4 3 2 50.0 38
Wyoming Cheyenne 3 2 0 0.0 78
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2005