Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2008
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 14,239 9,987 8,928 62.7 -
Kansas Topeka 175 169 157 89.7 1
D. C. Washington 9 8 8 88.9 2
MinnesotaMinneapolis 131 114 109 83.2 3
Ala, S Mobile 102 90 84 82.4 4
Ind, N South Bend 194 162 155 79.9 5
Ala, M Montgomery 98 85 78 79.6 6
Texas, E Tyler 313 274 247 78.9 7
Okla, W Oklahoma City 70 62 55 78.6 8
Hawaii Honolulu 51 46 40 78.4 9
Penn, M Scranton 91 75 71 78.0 10
Delaware Wilmington 67 61 52 77.6 11
Ala, N Birmingham 238 203 183 76.9 12
N Car, W Asheville 230 200 174 75.7 13
N. J. Newark 114 87 86 75.4 14
Wyoming Cheyenne 84 74 63 75.0 15
Wash, W Seattle 90 70 67 74.4 16
N. Y., N Syracuse 76 61 56 73.7 17
S Car Columbia 430 337 316 73.5 18
N. Y., S Manhattan 105 90 77 73.3 19
Virg, W Roanoke 211 159 152 72.0 20
Tenn, M Nashville 103 83 74 71.8 21
Ark, E Little Rock 111 95 79 71.2 22
N Car, M Greensboro 153 113 109 71.2 22
Virg, E Alexandria 531 400 377 71.0 24
N Car, E Raleigh 311 235 219 70.4 25
Mo, W Kansas City 377 274 264 70.0 26
N Mexico Albuquerque 83 66 58 69.9 27
W Virg, NWheeling 92 72 64 69.6 28
Texas, N Fort Worth 301 229 208 69.1 29
Cal, C Los Angeles 150 139 103 68.7 30
La, E New Orleans 117 86 80 68.4 31
Nebraska Omaha 41 29 28 68.3 32
Ohio, N Cleveland 290 208 196 67.6 33
Ken, E Lexington 223 168 150 67.3 34
La, W Shreveport 82 61 55 67.1 35
Mich, W Grand Rapids 120 90 80 66.7 36
N. Y., E Brooklyn 90 73 60 66.7 36
Ill, C Springfield 74 51 49 66.2 38
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 77 55 51 66.2 38
Mich, E Detroit 198 154 131 66.2 38
Iowa, S Des Moines 160 120 105 65.6 41
Wisc, W Madison 26 18 17 65.4 42
Mass Boston 92 67 60 65.2 43
Oregon Portland 120 89 78 65.0 44
Texas, W San Antonio 279 206 181 64.9 45
Ohio, S Cincinnati 219 161 142 64.8 46
Okla, N Tulsa 128 89 82 64.1 47
Cal, E Sacramento 101 75 64 63.4 48
Mo, E St. Louis 284 186 180 63.4 48
Fla, S Miami 419 310 265 63.2 50
Ga, N Atlanta 148 109 93 62.8 51
Penn, W Pittsburgh 164 107 103 62.8 51
N. Y., W Buffalo 184 132 115 62.5 53
Ga, S Savannah 230 171 143 62.2 54
Ill, N Chicago 139 93 86 61.9 55
N Dakota Fargo 74 48 45 60.8 56
Okla, E Muskogee 33 20 20 60.6 57
Texas, S Houston 320 216 192 60.0 58
Montana Billings 120 85 71 59.2 59
Tenn, E Knoxville 255 173 151 59.2 59
Alaska Anchorage 44 29 26 59.1 61
S Dakota Sioux Falls 58 40 34 58.6 62
Penn, E Philadelphia 288 177 168 58.3 63
Vermont Burlington 84 54 49 58.3 63
Colorado Denver 91 62 53 58.2 65
Arizona Phoenix 311 222 176 56.6 66
Cal, S San Diego 41 29 23 56.1 67
Maryland Baltimore 337 220 189 56.1 67
Ken, W Louisville 175 114 97 55.4 69
New Hamp Concord 36 22 19 52.8 70
Cal, N San Francisco 114 67 58 50.9 71
Conn New Haven 106 60 53 50.0 72
Utah Salt Lake City 260 144 130 50.0 72
Tenn, W Memphis 302 173 150 49.7 74
Wisc, E Milwaukee 149 86 73 49.0 75
Fla, N Pensacola 72 40 35 48.6 76
Miss, S Jackson 140 79 67 47.9 77
Fla, M Tampa 360 188 171 47.5 78
Ga, M Macon 71 41 33 46.5 79
La, M Baton Rouge 122 73 56 45.9 80
Ind, S Indianapolis 71 36 32 45.1 81
Ark, W Fort Smith 25 18 11 44.0 82
W Virg, SCharleston 41 18 18 43.9 83
Wash, E Spokane 162 82 71 43.8 84
R. I. Providence 37 16 15 40.5 85
Miss, N Oxford 98 40 39 39.8 86
Idaho Boise 108 51 42 38.9 87
Ill, S East St. Louis 89 37 34 38.2 88
Maine Portland 192 59 53 27.6 89
Nevada Las Vegas 296 75 64 21.6 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009