Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2008
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 14,239 9,987 8,928 62.7 -
Ala, N Birmingham 238 203 183 76.9 12
Ala, M Montgomery 98 85 78 79.6 6
Ala, S Mobile 102 90 84 82.4 4
Alaska Anchorage 44 29 26 59.1 61
Arizona Phoenix 311 222 176 56.6 66
Ark, E Little Rock 111 95 79 71.2 22
Ark, W Fort Smith 25 18 11 44.0 82
Cal, N San Francisco 114 67 58 50.9 71
Cal, C Los Angeles 150 139 103 68.7 30
Cal, E Sacramento 101 75 64 63.4 48
Cal, S San Diego 41 29 23 56.1 67
Colorado Denver 91 62 53 58.2 65
Conn New Haven 106 60 53 50.0 72
Delaware Wilmington 67 61 52 77.6 11
D. C. Washington 9 8 8 88.9 2
Fla, N Pensacola 72 40 35 48.6 76
Fla, M Tampa 360 188 171 47.5 78
Fla, S Miami 419 310 265 63.2 50
Ga, N Atlanta 148 109 93 62.8 51
Ga, M Macon 71 41 33 46.5 79
Ga, S Savannah 230 171 143 62.2 54
Hawaii Honolulu 51 46 40 78.4 9
Idaho Boise 108 51 42 38.9 87
Ill, N Chicago 139 93 86 61.9 55
Ill, S East St. Louis 89 37 34 38.2 88
Ill, C Springfield 74 51 49 66.2 38
Ind, N South Bend 194 162 155 79.9 5
Ind, S Indianapolis 71 36 32 45.1 81
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 77 55 51 66.2 38
Iowa, S Des Moines 160 120 105 65.6 41
Kansas Topeka 175 169 157 89.7 1
Ken, E Lexington 223 168 150 67.3 34
Ken, W Louisville 175 114 97 55.4 69
La, E New Orleans 117 86 80 68.4 31
La, M Baton Rouge 122 73 56 45.9 80
La, W Shreveport 82 61 55 67.1 35
Maine Portland 192 59 53 27.6 89
Maryland Baltimore 337 220 189 56.1 67
Mass Boston 92 67 60 65.2 43
Mich, E Detroit 198 154 131 66.2 38
Mich, W Grand Rapids 120 90 80 66.7 36
MinnesotaMinneapolis 131 114 109 83.2 3
Miss, N Oxford 98 40 39 39.8 86
Miss, S Jackson 140 79 67 47.9 77
Mo, E St. Louis 284 186 180 63.4 48
Mo, W Kansas City 377 274 264 70.0 26
Montana Billings 120 85 71 59.2 59
Nebraska Omaha 41 29 28 68.3 32
Nevada Las Vegas 296 75 64 21.6 90
New Hamp Concord 36 22 19 52.8 70
N. J. Newark 114 87 86 75.4 14
N Mexico Albuquerque 83 66 58 69.9 27
N. Y., N Syracuse 76 61 56 73.7 17
N. Y., E Brooklyn 90 73 60 66.7 36
N. Y., S Manhattan 105 90 77 73.3 19
N. Y., W Buffalo 184 132 115 62.5 53
N Car, E Raleigh 311 235 219 70.4 25
N Car, M Greensboro 153 113 109 71.2 22
N Car, W Asheville 230 200 174 75.7 13
N Dakota Fargo 74 48 45 60.8 56
Ohio, N Cleveland 290 208 196 67.6 33
Ohio, S Cincinnati 219 161 142 64.8 46
Okla, N Tulsa 128 89 82 64.1 47
Okla, E Muskogee 33 20 20 60.6 57
Okla, W Oklahoma City 70 62 55 78.6 8
Oregon Portland 120 89 78 65.0 44
Penn, E Philadelphia 288 177 168 58.3 63
Penn, M Scranton 91 75 71 78.0 10
Penn, W Pittsburgh 164 107 103 62.8 51
R. I. Providence 37 16 15 40.5 85
S Car Columbia 430 337 316 73.5 18
S Dakota Sioux Falls 58 40 34 58.6 62
Tenn, E Knoxville 255 173 151 59.2 59
Tenn, M Nashville 103 83 74 71.8 21
Tenn, W Memphis 302 173 150 49.7 74
Texas, N Fort Worth 301 229 208 69.1 29
Texas, E Tyler 313 274 247 78.9 7
Texas, S Houston 320 216 192 60.0 58
Texas, W San Antonio 279 206 181 64.9 45
Utah Salt Lake City 260 144 130 50.0 72
Vermont Burlington 84 54 49 58.3 63
Virg, E Alexandria 531 400 377 71.0 24
Virg, W Roanoke 211 159 152 72.0 20
Wash, E Spokane 162 82 71 43.8 84
Wash, W Seattle 90 70 67 74.4 16
W Virg, NWheeling 92 72 64 69.6 28
W Virg, SCharleston 41 18 18 43.9 83
Wisc, E Milwaukee 149 86 73 49.0 75
Wisc, W Madison 26 18 17 65.4 42
Wyoming Cheyenne 84 74 63 75.0 15


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009