Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 16,425 10,018 8,849 53.9 -
Ala, N Birmingham 190 163 147 77.4 4
Ala, M Montgomery 102 91 76 74.5 9
Ala, S Mobile 107 86 77 72.0 15
Alaska Anchorage 56 27 25 44.6 77
Arizona Phoenix 148 74 59 39.9 82
Ark, E Little Rock 124 79 65 52.4 63
Ark, W Fort Smith 46 19 15 32.6 85
Cal, N San Francisco 131 82 71 54.2 58
Cal, C Los Angeles 187 119 88 47.1 75
Cal, E Sacramento 96 68 59 61.5 43
Cal, S San Diego 22 15 12 54.5 57
Colorado Denver 202 150 134 66.3 32
Conn New Haven 93 48 41 44.1 78
Delaware Wilmington 61 52 49 80.3 2
D. C. Washington 23 19 16 69.6 20
Fla, N Pensacola 110 63 54 49.1 70
Fla, M Tampa 365 187 176 48.2 73
Fla, S Miami 298 220 188 63.1 38
Ga, N Atlanta 215 175 153 71.2 17
Ga, M Macon 109 64 56 51.4 65
Ga, S Savannah 126 86 74 58.7 48
Hawaii Honolulu 108 95 76 70.4 19
Idaho Boise 94 40 30 31.9 86
Ill, N Chicago 167 103 94 56.3 55
Ill, S East St. Louis 61 44 42 68.9 22
Ill, C Springfield 62 45 39 62.9 39
Ind, N South Bend 230 164 154 67.0 29
Ind, S Indianapolis 84 58 47 56.0 56
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 55 37 35 63.6 36
Iowa, S Des Moines 112 72 68 60.7 44
Kansas Topeka 129 113 97 75.2 6
Ken, E Lexington 259 150 128 49.4 69
Ken, W Louisville 147 75 70 47.6 74
La, E New Orleans 122 61 57 46.7 76
La, M Baton Rouge 99 64 50 50.5 67
La, W Shreveport 130 100 89 68.5 25
Maine Portland 160 74 62 38.8 83
Maryland Baltimore 345 230 195 56.5 54
Mass Boston 403 66 57 14.1 90
Mich, E Detroit 234 186 124 53.0 61
Mich, W Grand Rapids 149 97 87 58.4 50
MinnesotaMinneapolis 80 72 68 85.0 1
Miss, N Oxford 55 37 35 63.6 36
Miss, S Jackson 124 80 63 50.8 66
Mo, E St. Louis 394 245 230 58.4 50
Mo, W Kansas City 403 292 270 67.0 29
Montana Billings 123 68 60 48.8 71
Nebraska Omaha 121 98 86 71.1 18
Nevada Las Vegas 539 133 125 23.2 88
New Hamp Concord 16 13 11 68.8 23
N. J. Newark 111 71 65 58.6 49
N Mexico Albuquerque 148 102 86 58.1 52
N. Y., N Syracuse 106 74 66 62.3 40
N. Y., E Brooklyn 144 125 98 68.1 26
N. Y., S Manhattan 117 88 76 65.0 33
N. Y., W Buffalo 260 154 136 52.3 64
N Car, E Raleigh 358 286 268 74.9 8
N Car, M Greensboro 220 158 152 69.1 21
N Car, W Asheville 249 208 185 74.3 10
N Dakota Fargo 53 40 34 64.2 35
Ohio, N Cleveland 264 171 158 59.8 45
Ohio, S Cincinnati 182 144 125 68.7 24
Okla, N Tulsa 119 73 70 58.8 47
Okla, E Muskogee 40 28 26 65.0 33
Okla, W Oklahoma City 77 53 52 67.5 28
Oregon Portland 160 124 115 71.9 16
Penn, E Philadelphia 1,449 265 238 16.4 89
Penn, M Scranton 111 93 89 80.2 3
Penn, W Pittsburgh 157 97 85 54.1 59
R. I. Providence 179 45 43 24.0 87
S Car Columbia 373 281 270 72.4 14
S Dakota Sioux Falls 36 23 19 52.8 62
Tenn, E Knoxville 326 216 201 61.7 41
Tenn, M Nashville 149 107 92 61.7 41
Tenn, W Memphis 231 164 138 59.7 46
Texas, N Fort Worth 331 212 179 54.1 59
Texas, E Tyler 213 168 155 72.8 12
Texas, S Houston 242 192 162 66.9 31
Texas, W San Antonio 186 151 126 67.7 27
Utah Salt Lake City 460 216 192 41.7 79
Vermont Burlington 59 40 34 57.6 53
Virg, E Alexandria 401 335 308 76.8 5
Virg, W Roanoke 345 274 250 72.5 13
Wash, E Spokane 148 83 61 41.2 80
Wash, W Seattle 89 71 66 74.2 11
W Virg, NWheeling 110 47 39 35.5 84
W Virg, SCharleston 99 49 40 40.4 81
Wisc, E Milwaukee 96 55 48 50.0 68
Wisc, W Madison 41 24 20 48.8 71
Wyoming Cheyenne 84 68 63 75.0 7


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009