Internal Revenue Service Convictions for 2007

Number Year-to-date 1,081
Percent Change from previous year -1
Percent Change from 5 years ago 6.3
Percent Change from 10 years ago -35.9
Percent Change from 20 years ago -36.6

Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during FY 2007 the government reported 1,081 new convictions which had been referred by the Internal Revenue Service. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 1% over the past fiscal year when the number of convictions totaled 1,092.

About These Reports

For many years, Tax Analysts and the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) have vigorously exercised their rights under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain authoritative information from the Internal Revenue Service. Although the two public interest organizations have had a somewhat different focus, the ultimate goal was the same: to better understand how the IRS was going about achieving its difficult mission. Now TRAC and Tax Analysts have joined forces to offer a new series of monthly reports on a range of enforcement subjects, beginning with the use of the government's criminal powers. Forthcoming will be monthly reports on tax audits, collections and other related issues. In addition, more detailed information, obtained by following the "More" links, will be available at no cost for the first six months.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When this number of FY 2007 convictions of this type is compared with those five years ago where there were 1,017, the number of convictions was up (6.3 percent). But the number of convictions for the past year were much lower than they were ten years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are down 35.9 percent from level of 1,686 reported in 1997 and down 36.6 percent from the level of 1,704 reported in 1987.

The long term trend in convictions for these matters going back to FY 1987 is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars represent the number of convictions of this type recorded each fiscal year. Each presidential administration is distinguished by the color of the bars.

shortyear: 87
Convictions (Sum): 1,704
administration: Reaganshortyear: 88
Convictions (Sum): 1,697
administration: Reaganshortyear: 89
Convictions (Sum): 1,565
administration: Bush Ishortyear: 90
Convictions (Sum): 1,657
administration: Bush Ishortyear: 91
Convictions (Sum): 1,917
administration: Bush Ishortyear: 92
Convictions (Sum): 1,847
administration: Bush Ishortyear: 93
Convictions (Sum): 2,122
administration: Clintonshortyear: 94
Convictions (Sum): 1,991
administration: Clintonshortyear: 95
Convictions (Sum): 1,812
administration: Clintonshortyear: 96
Convictions (Sum): 1,585
administration: Clintonshortyear: 97
Convictions (Sum): 1,686
administration: Clintonshortyear: 98
Convictions (Sum): 1,744
administration: Clintonshortyear: 99
Convictions (Sum): 1,387
administration: Clintonshortyear: 00
Convictions (Sum): 1,334
administration: Clintonshortyear: 01
Convictions (Sum): 1,121
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 02
Convictions (Sum): 1,017
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 03
Convictions (Sum): 955
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 04
Convictions (Sum): 1,019
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 05
Convictions (Sum): 1,086
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 06
Convictions (Sum): 1,092
administration: Bush IIshortyear: 07
Convictions (Sum): 1,081
administration: Bush II
VBAR chart of shortyear

Figure 1: Criminal Convictions over the last 20 years
proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: White Collar Crime
percentage: 70%  (70.12%)proggrplabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (21%)proggrplabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (21%)proggrplabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (21%)proggrplabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (21%)proggrplabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (21%)proggrplabel: Narcotics/Drugs
percentage: 9%  (8.88%)proggrplabel: Narcotics/Drugs
percentage: 9%  (8.88%)proggrplabel: Narcotics/Drugs
percentage: 9%  (8.88%)
PIE3D chart of proggrplabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions

Leading Program Areas

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types. The single largest number of convictions of these matters through September 2007 was for "White Collar Crime", accounting for 70.1 percent of convictions.

The second largest number of matters were Convictions filed under the program area of "Narcotics/Drugs " (8.9%) . The "Other" category in Figure 2 is comprised of a diverse group of programs. The largest specific programs within the "Other" category were: Government Regulatory" (7.1%).

[The Department of Justice is withholding the program area for 5.2 percemt of the cases. These matters are also included in the "Other" category. TRAC, in ongoing litigation, has challenged the government's withholding of program category, winning a substantial victory in a September 2006 decision. The government, however, has filed a notice of appeal which has stayed the order requiring it to release program information.]

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded for cases which resulted in convictions in U.S. District Court during FY 2007. Note: There were an additional 72 other lead charges which were not individually ranked.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1 yr ago 5 yrs ago 10 yrs ago 20 yrs ago  
26 USC 7206 - Fraud and False statements 203 1 1 1 2 3 More
26 USC 7201 - Attempt to evade or defeat tax 175 2 2 2 1 1 More
18 USC 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments 102 3 3 3 3 35 More
18 USC 0371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 71 4 4 4 5 5 More
18 USC 0287 - False, fictitious or fraudulent claims 66 6 6 6 6 4 More
18 USC 0286 - Conspiracy to defraud the Government claims 60 7 7 8 7 7 More
26 USC 7203 - Willful failure to file return, supply information 58 8 5 7 4 2 More
21 USC 0846 - Attempt and conspiracy 28 9 11 5 8 8 More
18 USC 1341 - Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles 25 10 9 9 11 14 More
21 USC 0841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 25 10 15 10 9 10 More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Fraud and False statements" (Title 26 U.S.C Section 7206) was the most frequently recorded lead charge. Title 26 U.S.C Section 7206 was also ranked 1st a year ago and 1st five years ago. It was ranked 2nd ten years ago and 3rd twenty years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Attempt to evade or defeat tax" under Title 26 U.S.C Section 7201. Title 26 U.S.C Section 7201 was ranked again 2nd both a year ago and five years ago. However, it was ranked 1st ten year ago and 1st twenty years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Laundering of monetary instruments" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1956. Title 18 U.S.C Section 1956 held the same ranking in third place last year, five years ago, as well as ten years ago. It was ranked 35th twenty years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 150  percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 that involves "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited Acts A." This was the same statute that had the largest increase—114%—when compared with five years ago.

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 30.6  percent—was "Mail Fraud - Frauds and Swindles" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1341). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease—52.5%—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

During FY 2006 the Justice Department said the government obtained 3.7 convictions for every one million people in the United States. The level during FY 2007 was essentially unchanged at again 3.7 convictions. Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts

Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago 10yrs ago 20yrs ago  
D. C. 9 5 1 73 37 27 43 More
Nevada 7 17 2 15 4 8 1 More
Ill, N 7 65 3 21 58 58 43 More
Vermont 6 4 4 88 43 89 86 More
Hawaii 6 8 5 6 1 31 39 More
Ala, S 6 5 6 2 3 1 29 More
Okla, N 6 6 7 3 5 4 15 More
Alaska 6 4 8 54 86 23 23 More
Ala, N 6 16 9 59 61 77 61 More
Mich, E 6 40 10 56 40 48 61 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per one million people)

  • The District of Washington, D.C. (Washington)—with 9.0 convictions as compared with 3.7 convictions per one million people in the United States—was the most active through September 2007.

  • The District of Nevada ranked 2nd, with 7.3 convictions per million.

  • The Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) now ranks 3rd, with 7.1 just under Nevada's per capita rate.

Except for districts with large populations, a relatively small difference in the number of convictions can have a substantial effect on these rankings. Hence we see considerable year-to-year change in relative district rankings. Nonetheless, Nevada, Hawaii, the Southern District of Alabama (Mobile), and the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa) have placed in the top rankings more often than not across the years shown.

Despite being the locus of major cities, the District of Columbia, and the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) do not show up in the top ten in Table 3 in previous years. And the federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago—399 percent—was Washington, D.C. (Washington). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth—191 percent—was Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of convictions—37.5 percent—was Southern District of Alabama (Mobile). 



TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) is a data gathering, data research and data distribution organization at Syracuse University. TRAC's purpose is to provide the American people — and institutions of oversight such as Congress, news organizations, public interest groups, businesses, scholars and lawyers — with comprehensive information about staffing, spending, and enforcement activities of the federal government.