Judge William L. Abbott
FY 2005 - 2010, El Paso Immigration Court
Judge Abbott was appointed as an Immigration Judge in December 1995. He was assigned to
the Immigration Court in El Paso, Texas, in September 2002, after serving seven years as an
Immigration Judge in Eloy, Arizona. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1983 from
Southwest Texas State University, and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Tulsa School
of Law in 1987. After graduating from law school, Judge Abbott joined the Department of
Justice through the Attorney General's Honors Program. From 1992 to 1995, Judge Abbott was
a trial attorney with the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in El Paso, Texas.
He also served with INS as both sector counsel in El Paso from 1989 to 1992, and as a trial
attorney in Houston, Texas, from 1987 to 1988. Judge Abbott served in the U.S. Navy from 1976 to 1982. He is a member of both the Oklahoma and Texas Bars.
Deciding Asylum Cases
Figure 1: Percent of Asylum Matters Denied
Detailed data on Judge Abbott decisions were examined for the period covering
fiscal years 2005 through 2010. During this period, Judge
Abbott is recorded as deciding 233 asylum claims on their merits. Of these,
he granted 80, gave no conditional grants, and denied 153.
Converted to percentage terms, Abbott denied 65.7 percent and granted (including
conditional grants) 34.3 percent. Figure 1 provides a comparison of Judge Abbott's
denial rate fiscal year-by-year over this recent period.
(Rates for years with less than 25 decisions are not shown.)
Nationwide Comparisons
Compared to Judge Abbott's denial rate of 65.7 percent, nationally
during this same period, immigration court judges denied 55.4 percent
of asylum claims. In the El Paso Immigration Court where Judge Abbott
was based, judges there denied asylum 75.8 percent of the time. See Figure 2.
Figure 2: Comparing Denial Rates (percents)
Judge Abbott can also be ranked compared to each of the 253 individual immigration judges
serving during this period who rendered at least one hundred decisions in a city's immigration court. If judges were ranked
from 1 to 253 - where 1 represented the highest denial percent and 253
represented the lowest - Judge Abbott here receives a rank of 113. That is 112
judges denied asylum at higher rates, and 140 denied asylum at the same
rate or less often. Ranks are tallied separately for each immigration court. Should a judge serve on more than one court
during this period, separate ranks would be assigned in any court that the judge rendered at least 100 asylum decisions in.
Why Do Denial Rates Vary Among Judges?
Denial rates reflect in part the differing composition of cases assigned to
different immigration judges. For example, being represented in court and the nationality
of the asylum seeker appear to often impact decision outcome. Decisions also appear to
reflect in part the personal perspective that the judge brings to the bench.
Figure 3: Asylum Seeker Had Representation
Representation
If an asylum seeker is not represented by an
attorney, almost all (88%) of them are denied asylum. In contrast, a
significantly higher proportion of represented asylum seekers are successful.
In the case of Judge Abbott, 42.1% were not
represented by an attorney. See Figure 3. For the nation as a whole,
about 11% of asylum seekers are not represented.
Nationality
Asylum seekers are a
diverse group. Over one hundred different nationalities had at least one hundred
individuals claiming asylum decided during this period. As might be expected,
immigration courts located in different parts of the country tend to have
proportionately larger shares from some countries than from others. And, given
the required legal grounds for a successful asylum claim, asylum seekers
from some nations tend to be more successful than others.
Figure 4: Asylum Decisions by Nationality
For Judge Abbott, the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before him came
from Burma. Individuals from this nation made up 19.7 % of his caseload.
Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Abbott were:
El Salvador (10.7 %), China (9%), Mexico (8.2%), Ethiopia (6%).
See Figure 4.
In the nation as a whole during this same period, major nationalities of asylum
seekers, in descending order of frequency, were China (21.7%), Haiti (9.9%), Colombia (7.1%),
El Salvador (5.1%), Guatemala (4.8%), Indonesia (3.6%), India (2.6%), Venezuela (2.5%), Albania (2.5%),
Ethiopia (1.9%), Honduras (1.8%), Guinea (1.6%), Mexico (1.5%).