Has Cooperation by State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies Improved ICE's Apprehension Numbers?

As a complement to reforms of ICE detainer practices introduced in November 2014 by the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP), Department of Homeland Secretary Jeh Johnson announced a major organized outreach effort to gain back law enforcement agency cooperation. This effort sought to counter the growing unpopularity of DHS's Secure Communities Program. As Johnson noted: "Governors, mayors, and state and local law enforcement officials around the country have increasingly refused to cooperate with the [Secure Communities] program, and many have issued executive orders or signed laws prohibiting such cooperation."[1]

In a December 22, 2015 press release, Secretary Johnson announced that this outreach effort had been quite successful: "Of the 25 largest jurisdictions that had placed restrictions on their own cooperation with ICE, 16 are now working with us again for the good of public safety."

This report, the second in a two-part series, examines the data behind these claims. Detainers sent to local law enforcement officials — often referred to as I-247s after the government form that is used — have historically been a major method Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employs to take into custody individuals thought to be deportable. TRAC's findings based upon a review of individual detainer records call into question the assumed linkage between cooperation with ICE by state and local law enforcement agencies and ICE's success in apprehending immigrants it seeks to deport.


Figure 1. State and Local Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) Refuses ICE I-247 Detainer Request

TRAC's last report documented that ICE still has failed to target its detainer program on noncitizens convicted of significant criminal offenses. This report examines whether ICE actually takes individuals into custody who it targeted with those detainers. Two conclusions emerge:

  • According to ICE data, DHS outreach efforts have drastically curbed reported refusals by law enforcement agencies to transfer custody of individuals over to ICE. During the first two months of FY 2016 ICE reports only 2 percent of the agency's I- 247 requests were refused. See Figure 1.

  • While recorded refusal rates fell sharply, the proportion of occasions where ICE took custody of the individual after issuing I-247 requests has not rebounded. Indeed, this rate has continued to decline. It is now below 40 percent. See Figure 2.

The end result is that ICE has not improved its performance through its detainer program in apprehending individuals who the agency seeks to deport. Details for these two findings are discussed in the sections that follow.


Figure 2. Outcome of ICE I-247 Detainer Requests

Are State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies Now Cooperating with ICE?

Under DHS's Secure Communities program, ICE data recorded a sharp rise in refusals by state and local law enforcement agencies (LEAs). This rise in recorded refusals began in the latter half of 2013, and peaked during the summer of 2014. Then, as shown in Figure 1, refusal rates began falling as DHS discontinued Secure Communities and mounted an aggressive outreach effort.

Thus, these DHS outreach efforts would appear to have drastically curbed refusals to transfer individuals who state and local law enforcement agencies had in custody over to ICE enforcement officers. During the first two months of FY 2016, for example, ICE data indicate only 2 percent of ICE's I-247 requests were refused. This was down from a high of over 10 percent in the months preceding the termination of the Secure Communities program.

However, some caution is warranted before reaching any definitive conclusion. This is because TRAC found serious quality issues in ICE's recording of refusal rates. TRAC notes that ICE apparently does not require that information tracking law enforcement agency refusals be systematically entered in its database. Rather, recording this information is optional. The database field the agency uses records a variety of different reasons why ICE "lifted" — that is withdrew — a custody transfer request.

These recorded "lift" reasons often disagree with other information ICE records on whether the individual was actually booked into its custody. For example, ICE sometimes records an agency refused its transfer request even though other data indicates ICE actually assumed custody of the individual. In addition, some jurisdictions that adopted restrictive measures curtailing cooperation with ICE's detainer program do not show up in ICE data as actually refusing ICE detainers.

It is thus unclear whether meaningful cooperation has increased, or whether ICE practices have changed in recording when refusals occur.

Even when comparing states there seems to be a serious disconnect between recorded refusals and whether ICE took the subject of the detainer into custody. Examining records state-by- state for the entire FY 2014 - FY 2016 period, the failure to assume custody ranged from a high of 86.9 percent in Indiana down to a low of 29.4 percent in Arizona. Yet both of these states had exactly the same recorded LEA refusal rate — a mere 0.1 percent. See Table 1.

Table 1. Outcome of ICE I-247 Detainer Requests by State, FY 2014 - FY 2016*
    Number Per Cent
State Total I-247s ICE Takes Custody No ICE Custody LEA Refused*** % ICE Takes Custody % No ICE Custody % LEA Refused
Total** 267,548 118,947 148,601 16,305 44.5% 55.5% 6.1%
INDIANA 1,385 181 1,204 2 13.1% 86.9% 0.1%
MISSOURI 876 118 758 3 13.5% 86.5% 0.3%
VERMONT 26 4 22 0 15.4% 84.6% 0.0%
RHODE ISLAND 137 33 104 13 24.1% 75.9% 9.5%
LOUISIANA 1,892 456 1,436 20 24.1% 75.9% 1.1%
KANSAS 1,082 263 819 27 24.3% 75.7% 2.5%
MAINE 53 13 40 0 24.5% 75.5% 0.0%
ALASKA 64 17 47 0 26.6% 73.4% 0.0%
IOWA 1,345 370 975 51 27.5% 72.5% 3.8%
KENTUCKY 888 252 636 14 28.4% 71.6% 1.6%
TENNESSEE 3,740 1,071 2,669 10 28.6% 71.4% 0.3%
NEBRASKA 1,448 424 1,024 21 29.3% 70.7% 1.5%
NEW MEXICO 1,679 501 1,178 129 29.8% 70.2% 7.7%
OKLAHOMA 3,559 1,104 2,455 30 31.0% 69.0% 0.8%
ILLINOIS 4,615 1,448 3,167 456 31.4% 68.6% 9.9%
DELAWARE 297 94 203 0 31.6% 68.4% 0.0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 318 103 215 6 32.4% 67.6% 1.9%
CALIFORNIA 46,444 15,211 31,233 7,292 32.8% 67.2% 15.7%
NEW YORK 10,768 3,562 7,206 1,696 33.1% 66.9% 15.8%
ARKANSAS 1,664 553 1,111 8 33.2% 66.8% 0.5%
SOUTH DAKOTA 297 100 197 1 33.7% 66.3% 0.3%
PENNSYLVANIA 5,382 2,048 3,334 171 38.1% 61.9% 3.2%
HAWAII 213 82 131 0 38.5% 61.5% 0.0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 3,031 1,191 1,840 5 39.3% 60.7% 0.2%
FLORIDA 11,462 4,605 6,857 1,022 40.2% 59.8% 8.9%
MINNESOTA 2,239 910 1,329 158 40.6% 59.4% 7.1%
COLORADO 5,268 2,162 3,106 804 41.0% 59.0% 15.3%
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 323 133 190 9 41.2% 58.8% 2.8%
MISSISSIPPI 2,570 1,068 1,502 12 41.6% 58.4% 0.5%
MONTANA 55 23 32 0 41.8% 58.2% 0.0%
MARYLAND 2,247 959 1,288 234 42.7% 57.3% 10.4%
IDAHO 1,381 590 791 1 42.7% 57.3% 0.1%
ALABAMA 2,529 1,096 1,433 19 43.3% 56.7% 0.8%
NORTH CAROLINA 6,275 2,727 3,548 20 43.5% 56.5% 0.3%
OHIO 3,835 1,685 2,150 77 43.9% 56.1% 2.0%
MASSACHUSETTS 1,232 551 681 12 44.7% 55.3% 1.0%
OREGON 2,595 1,206 1,389 184 46.5% 53.5% 7.1%
WYOMING 348 169 179 0 48.6% 51.4% 0.0%
GEORGIA 11,089 5,585 5,504 37 50.4% 49.6% 0.3%
NEW JERSEY 3,739 1,888 1,851 38 50.5% 49.5% 1.0%
WASHINGTON 3,620 1,909 1,711 358 52.7% 47.3% 9.9%
CONNECTICUT 500 264 236 30 52.8% 47.2% 6.0%
WEST VIRGINIA 316 172 144 1 54.4% 45.6% 0.3%
MICHIGAN 1,413 775 638 2 54.8% 45.2% 0.1%
NEVADA 3,204 1,814 1,390 340 56.6% 43.4% 10.6%
NORTH DAKOTA 145 86 59 1 59.3% 40.7% 0.7%
UTAH 2,575 1,557 1,018 3 60.5% 39.5% 0.1%
WISCONSIN 1,649 1,005 644 17 60.9% 39.1% 1.0%
TEXAS 58,452 35,632 22,820 18 61.0% 39.0% 0.0%
VIRGINIA 5,860 3,993 1,867 16 68.1% 31.9% 0.3%
ARIZONA 16,724 11,811 4,913 13 70.6% 29.4% 0.1%
* Coverage through the first two months of FY 2016; after July 2015 includes both I-247D and I-247N custody requests.
** Total includes Puerto Rico and territories, along with I-247s where state not listed.
*** ICE did not assume custody and it recorded refusal by law enforcement agency (LEA) sent notice or detainer request.

ICE Still Failing to Take Most Detainer Targets into Custody

Since April of 2014 the majority of ICE requests to law enforcement agencies (LEAs) to assume custody of an individual have not been effectuated. That is, examining each I-247 form that ICE prepared, ICE assumed custody less than half of the time. Indeed, during the first two months of FY 2016, ICE did not assume custody of more than six out of every ten individuals against whom detainers were lodged.

These figures are in sharp contrast to ICE's success rate back in FY 2009. Then 70 percent of its detainers resulted in ICE successfully taking the individual into custody. The drop from this 70 percent rate during FY 2009 to below 40 percent so far in FY 2016 is dramatic.[2] While there are potentially many legitimate reasons why ICE might issue an I-247 form but then not take custody of the individual, the magnitude of this decline is startling.

As shown in Table 2 and Figure 2, this decline appears to have begun at a time when ICE was rapidly expanding the number of detainers it issued under Secure Communities. It may be that this rapid expansion exceeded ICE's capacity to actually pick up and detain the individuals on whom it issued detainers. Only after the growth in the number of ICE detainers ended, and indeed detainer numbers began to fall, did the proportion of those ICE took into custody appear to stabilize at around 55 percent.

The second precipitous fall — this time from around 55 percent to below 40 percent — occurred more recently as more and more law enforcement agencies started refusing to honor ICE detainers. However it remains a puzzle — if in fact DHS's outreach efforts have improved LEA cooperation as Secretary Johnson reports — why no corresponding increase has occurred in the occasions where individuals were transferred to ICE custody. Using this latter criteria, Homeland Security's outreach to state and local law enforcement agencies would not appear as yet to have brought about any major impact on ICE's success in taking individuals thought to be deportable into custody.

Table 2. Outcome of ICE I-247 Detainer Requests, FY 2009 - FY 2016
(click title to open in a new window)
    Number Per Cent
Year and Month Total I-247s ICE Takes Custody No ICE Custody LEA Refused* % ICE Takes Custody % No ICE Custody % LEA Refused
2008-10 19,349 13,895 5,454 0 71.8% 28.2% 0.0%
2008-11 17,449 12,303 5,146 0 70.5% 29.5% 0.0%
2008-12 17,178 12,142 5,036 2 70.7% 29.3% 0.0%
2009-01 18,313 12,972 5,341 0 70.8% 29.2% 0.0%
2009-02 18,756 13,506 5,250 1 72.0% 28.0% 0.0%
2009-03 21,060 15,060 6,000 1 71.5% 28.5% 0.0%
2009-04 19,955 14,100 5,855 3 70.7% 29.3% 0.0%
2009-05 21,217 14,349 6,868 1 67.6% 32.4% 0.0%
2009-06 22,045 15,207 6,838 2 69.0% 31.0% 0.0%
2009-07 23,302 15,886 7,416 0 68.2% 31.8% 0.0%
2009-08 23,005 15,553 7,452 0 67.6% 32.4% 0.0%
2009-09 22,317 15,192 7,125 4 68.1% 31.9% 0.0%
2009-10 21,621 14,365 7,256 3 66.4% 33.6% 0.0%
2009-11 20,312 13,229 7,083 0 65.1% 34.9% 0.0%
2009-12 20,145 12,828 7,317 2 63.7% 36.3% 0.0%
2010-01 21,934 13,774 8,160 1 62.8% 37.2% 0.0%
2010-02 21,113 13,481 7,632 2 63.9% 36.1% 0.0%
2010-03 25,102 16,713 8,389 5 66.6% 33.4% 0.0%
2010-04 24,892 16,328 8,564 2 65.6% 34.4% 0.0%
2010-05 25,876 16,607 9,269 2 64.2% 35.8% 0.0%
2010-06 25,746 16,276 9,470 2 63.2% 36.8% 0.0%
2010-07 27,612 15,137 12,475 4 54.8% 45.2% 0.0%
2010-08 26,330 16,182 10,148 1 61.5% 38.5% 0.0%
2010-09 24,719 15,549 9,170 3 62.9% 37.1% 0.0%
2010-10 25,026 14,996 10,030 2 59.9% 40.1% 0.0%
2010-11 24,505 14,546 9,959 4 59.4% 40.6% 0.0%
2010-12 23,580 13,602 9,978 1 57.7% 42.3% 0.0%
2011-01 24,820 14,159 10,661 4 57.0% 43.0% 0.0%
2011-02 24,403 13,799 10,604 2 56.5% 43.5% 0.0%
2011-03 27,916 15,868 12,048 5 56.8% 43.2% 0.0%
2011-04 26,269 14,752 11,517 4 56.2% 43.8% 0.0%
2011-05 26,808 14,800 12,008 4 55.2% 44.8% 0.0%
2011-06 26,947 14,666 12,281 1 54.4% 45.6% 0.0%
2011-07 26,460 14,463 11,997 3 54.7% 45.3% 0.0%
2011-08 27,755 15,508 12,247 10 55.9% 44.1% 0.0%
2011-09 25,208 13,913 11,295 7 55.2% 44.8% 0.0%
2011-10 24,856 13,796 11,060 50 55.5% 44.5% 0.2%
2011-11 22,822 12,752 10,070 29 55.9% 44.1% 0.1%
2011-12 21,831 11,922 9,909 36 54.6% 45.4% 0.2%
2012-01 23,646 12,781 10,865 19 54.1% 45.9% 0.1%
2012-02 23,288 12,773 10,515 27 54.8% 45.2% 0.1%
2012-03 23,920 13,190 10,730 54 55.1% 44.9% 0.2%
2012-04 23,652 13,424 10,228 27 56.8% 43.2% 0.1%
2012-05 23,609 13,534 10,075 23 57.3% 42.7% 0.1%
2012-06 22,017 12,604 9,413 39 57.2% 42.8% 0.2%
2012-07 23,186 13,427 9,759 85 57.9% 42.1% 0.4%
2012-08 22,678 12,940 9,738 32 57.1% 42.9% 0.1%
2012-09 20,676 11,889 8,787 23 57.5% 42.5% 0.1%
2012-10 20,972 11,803 9,169 62 56.3% 43.7% 0.3%
2012-11 18,068 9,944 8,124 42 55.0% 45.0% 0.2%
2012-12 16,962 9,258 7,704 45 54.6% 45.4% 0.3%
2013-01 17,120 9,437 7,683 64 55.1% 44.9% 0.4%
2013-02 15,559 8,142 7,417 61 52.3% 47.7% 0.4%
2013-03 17,611 9,594 8,017 71 54.5% 45.5% 0.4%
2013-04 18,066 9,660 8,406 57 53.5% 46.5% 0.3%
2013-05 17,937 9,374 8,563 87 52.3% 47.7% 0.5%
2013-06 16,454 8,339 8,115 84 50.7% 49.3% 0.5%
2013-07 16,985 9,286 7,699 73 54.7% 45.3% 0.4%
2013-08 17,163 9,526 7,637 106 55.5% 44.5% 0.6%
2013-09 16,311 9,052 7,259 110 55.5% 44.5% 0.7%
2013-10 16,581 9,400 7,181 210 56.7% 43.3% 1.3%
2013-11 14,436 8,200 6,236 207 56.8% 43.2% 1.4%
2013-12 13,123 7,422 5,701 232 56.6% 43.4% 1.8%
2014-01 13,307 6,904 6,403 776 51.9% 48.1% 5.8%
2014-02 12,820 6,459 6,361 873 50.4% 49.6% 6.8%
2014-03 13,995 7,062 6,933 976 50.5% 49.5% 7.0%
2014-04 13,121 6,201 6,920 1,037 47.3% 52.7% 7.9%
2014-05 12,714 5,936 6,778 1,127 46.7% 53.3% 8.9%
2014-06 12,324 5,417 6,907 1,282 44.0% 56.0% 10.4%
2014-07 12,589 5,176 7,413 1,304 41.1% 58.9% 10.4%
2014-08 12,681 5,101 7,580 1,250 40.2% 59.8% 9.9%
2014-09 11,519 4,748 6,771 1,167 41.2% 58.8% 10.1%
2014-10 11,201 4,423 6,778 1,054 39.5% 60.5% 9.4%
2014-11 9,452 3,499 5,953 891 37.0% 63.0% 9.4%
2014-12 8,105 2,876 5,229 598 35.5% 64.5% 7.4%
2015-01 7,093 2,841 4,252 450 40.1% 59.9% 6.3%
2015-02 6,975 2,829 4,146 413 40.6% 59.4% 5.9%
2015-03 7,954 3,231 4,723 431 40.6% 59.4% 5.4%
2015-04 8,001 3,170 4,831 411 39.6% 60.4% 5.1%
2015-05 7,559 2,912 4,647 341 38.5% 61.5% 4.5%
2015-06 7,487 2,812 4,675 352 37.6% 62.4% 4.7%
2015-07 7,017 2,502 4,515 331 35.7% 64.3% 4.7%
2015-08 7,444 2,767 4,677 191 37.2% 62.8% 2.6%
2015-09 6,797 2,438 4,359 154 35.9% 64.1% 2.3%
2015-10 7,107 2,549 4,558 150 35.9% 64.1% 2.1%
2015-11 6,146 2,072 4,074 97 33.7% 66.3% 1.6%
* ICE did not assume custody and it recorded refusal by law enforcement agency (LEA) sent detainer or notice request.

Details Now Available for Individual State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies

TRAC has just released a new free detainer app that allows users to examine the details month-by-month on ICE I-247 forms sent to each individual state and local law enforcement agency during FY 2003 to FY 2016. Available are ICE records on whether the detainer request was refused, as well as whether ICE successfully took the individual sought into custody. Users can drill in to analyze what happened to detainers depending upon whether the individual had ever been convicted of any crime, as well as drill further down to the specific criminal offense - drunk driving versus homicide, for example. Demographic information by age, citizenship, and gender can also be examined.

The data show that while Texas leads the country in receiving the largest number of ICE I-247s since FY 2014, California law enforcement agencies have racked up the largest number of recorded refusals of ICE detainers. That state also had the largest number of occasions in which ICE fails to assume custody of an individual after it issued an I-247.

Table 3 presents some highlights from this wealth of data. If the proportion of detainer requests that state and local LEAs refused to honor is examined during the months immediately prior to the ending of Secure Communities, California LEAs not surprisingly held each of the top spots. The Santa Clara County Main Jail had the highest recorded refusal rate in the nation at 88.2 percent. However, in the latest available data since Secretary Johnson's reforms were implemented (July - November 2015), the recorded refusal rate has plummeted to 4.8 percent. Yet ICE still failed to assume custody of virtually every individual on whom it sent an I-247 form to the Santa Clara authorities both before and after the outreach effort by DHS occurred. This raises the question: Did Santa Clara's cooperation actually increase? Or did ICE simply stop recording refusals that occurred? Or is there some other explanation for these wildly dissimilar trends?

A similar divergent picture emerges, depending upon the measure of cooperation, for the LEAs who had the second and third highest recorded refusal rates in the months immediately prior to DHS's outreach efforts. The Santa Rita Jail in Alameda County, California, was second with an 80.1 percent recorded refusal rate, while the San Mateo County Jail in California had 74.1 percent. Each of these saw their recorded refusal rates plummet to 0.9 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively, in the most recent ICE records. Yet ICE still failed to take into custody the vast majority of individuals held in these jails during this same period on whom I-247s were issued.

However, recorded LEA refusal rates did not always plummet between June 2014 and November 2015. The fourth highest recorded refusal rate in the nation of 68.7 before PEP was announced was by the Ventura County Jail in California. After the reforms, ICE recorded that the refusal rate declined. However, this facility still refused half of all I-247s it received. ICE data also showed a parallel increase in the rate individuals held in Ventura County Jail were taken into ICE custody — from 0.4 percent before the reforms to 12.5 percent after they occurred.

Beyond California, three other law enforcement agencies were among the top ten recording the highest refusal rates before PEP was announced. These were the Philadelphia Detention facility in Pennsylvania (sixth place), the King County Adult Jail in Washington State (eighth place), and the Cook County Jail in Illinois (tenth place) — all facilities located in major metropolitan areas in the nation. King County and Cook County facilities refusal rates each plummeted in the latest ICE data, while ICE failed to show any increase in the proportion of individuals with I-247s taken into custody. The Philadelphia Detention facility, in contrast, showed only a modest drop in recorded refusal rates (from 67.3 to 50.0 percent) and a similar small increase in those ICE took into custody (from 14.5 to 25 percent).

Similar data for additional facilities can be found below in Table 3. Information for other specific time periods can be found in TRAC's new free detainer app.

Table 3. Outcome of ICE I-247 Requests for Custody Before and After Implementation of Priority Enforcement Program (PEP)
(click title to open in a new window)
  Before PEP (June-Oct 2014) PEP (July-Nov2015) Before PEP vs. After PEP
State County and Law Enforcement Facility* Total I-247s No ICE Custody LEA Refused** Total I-247s No ICE Custody LEA Refused % No ICE Custody % LEA Refused
  Before After Before After
Total 60,314 35,449 6,057 34,511 22,183 923 58.8% 64.3% 10.0% 2.7%
CALIFORNIA Santa Clara County - Santa Clara County Main Jail 229 229 202 147 146 7 100.0% 99.3% 88.2% 4.8%
CALIFORNIA Alameda County - Santa Rita Jail 296 295 237 113 85 1 99.7% 75.2% 80.1% 0.9%
CALIFORNIA San Mateo County - San Mateo Co Jail 139 139 103 85 83 2 100.0% 97.6% 74.1% 2.4%
CALIFORNIA Ventura County - Ventura County Jail 249 248 171 281 246 144 99.6% 87.5% 68.7% 51.2%
CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara County - Santa Barbara County Jail 228 227 156 227 180 38 99.6% 79.3% 68.4% 16.7%
PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia County - Philadelphia Detention Ct 55 47 37 8 6 4 85.5% 75.0% 67.3% 50.0%
CALIFORNIA Santa Clara County - Santa Clara County Jail 66 66 43 45 44 1 100.0% 97.8% 65.2% 2.2%
WASHINGTON King County - King County Adult Jail 83 73 53 27 24 1 88.0% 88.9% 63.9% 3.7%
CALIFORNIA Contra Costa County - Contra Costa County Jail 204 203 127 131 111 5 99.5% 84.7% 62.3% 3.8%
ILLINOIS Cook County - Cook County Jail 307 297 190 41 40 8 96.7% 97.6% 61.9% 19.5%
CALIFORNIA San Francisco County - San Francisco Co Jail 131 131 81 88 88 6 100.0% 100.0% 61.8% 6.8%
COLORADO Denver County - Denver Justice Center 268 194 165 122 53 20 72.4% 43.4% 61.6% 16.4%
FLORIDA Miami-Dade County - Dade County Correctional 302 284 183 61 59 33 94.0% 96.7% 60.6% 54.1%
FLORIDA Miami-Dade County - Turner Guiford Knight (Tgk) Jail 114 110 65 52 51 19 96.5% 98.1% 57.0% 36.5%
CALIFORNIA Sonoma County - Sonoma Co Main Adult Det 135 135 64 87 82 0 100.0% 94.3% 47.4% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Fresno County - Fresno County Jail 225 193 103 109 86 0 85.8% 78.9% 45.8% 0.0%
NEVADA Clark County - Clark County Det.Center 296 208 131 172 90 21 70.3% 52.3% 44.3% 12.2%
COLORADO Unknown county - Arapahoe County Jail 53 40 23 39 25 6 75.5% 64.1% 43.4% 15.4%
CALIFORNIA San Joaquin County - San Joaquin County Jail 123 123 53 93 92 9 100.0% 98.9% 43.1% 9.7%
COLORADO Weld County - Weld County Jail 65 54 28 34 26 14 83.1% 76.5% 43.1% 41.2%
NEW YORK Unknown county - Rikers Island, Queens, Ny 594 454 254 64 62 8 76.4% 96.9% 42.8% 12.5%
COLORADO Jefferson County - Jefferson County Jail 66 47 28 33 22 3 71.2% 66.7% 42.4% 9.1%
NEW YORK Queens County - Queens Central Booking 336 212 136 22 22 7 63.1% 100.0% 40.5% 31.8%
NEW YORK Bronx County - Bronx Central Booking 149 106 59 19 18 2 71.1% 94.7% 39.6% 10.5%
FLORIDA Broward County - Broward County Jail 148 128 58 38 35 3 86.5% 92.1% 39.2% 7.9%
CALIFORNIA Sacramento County - Sacramento County Jail 168 122 64 64 55 9 72.6% 85.9% 38.1% 14.1%
NEW YORK Kings County - Brooklyn Central Booking 237 157 90 17 17 3 66.2% 100.0% 38.0% 17.6%
CALIFORNIA Marin County - Marin Co. Jail 52 50 19 42 37 3 96.2% 88.1% 36.5% 7.1%
OREGON Washington County - Washington County Jail 59 30 20 21 14 3 50.8% 66.7% 33.9% 14.3%
MARYLAND Prince George's County - Prince Georges Co Det Cen 116 71 37 20 13 7 61.2% 65.0% 31.9% 35.0%
MINNESOTA Hennepin County - Hennepin County Adc 123 93 39 70 60 8 75.6% 85.7% 31.7% 11.4%
CALIFORNIA Riverside County - Riverside County Sheriff 195 187 57 126 126 1 95.9% 100.0% 29.2% 0.8%
NEW YORK New York County - Manhattan Central Booking 173 107 49 24 24 3 61.8% 100.0% 28.3% 12.5%
MARYLAND Baltimore County - Baltimore County Det. Center 60 27 16 15 9 2 45.0% 60.0% 26.7% 13.3%
CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County - Los Angeles County Jail 1,492 925 377 530 350 4 62.0% 66.0% 25.3% 0.8%
CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County - Los Custody Case Holding Facility 84 38 21 8 0 0 45.2% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA San Diego County - Vista Detention Facility 395 162 96 114 17 0 41.0% 14.9% 24.3% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Merced County - Merced County Jail 70 65 17 25 24 0 92.9% 96.0% 24.3% 0.0%
COLORADO Adams County - Adams County Jail 168 62 40 102 38 5 36.9% 37.3% 23.8% 4.9%
CALIFORNIA Monterey County - Monterey Co. Jail 177 174 42 260 124 2 98.3% 47.7% 23.7% 0.8%
FLORIDA Pinellas County - Pinellas County Jail 72 53 17 10 10 0 73.6% 100.0% 23.6% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA San Bernardino County - San Bernardino County Jail 218 216 48 143 127 1 99.1% 88.8% 22.0% 0.7%
CALIFORNIA San Diego County - San Diego County Jail 342 161 73 140 42 1 47.1% 30.0% 21.3% 0.7%
CALIFORNIA Kern County - Kern County Jail 220 163 39 131 117 6 74.1% 89.3% 17.7% 4.6%
CALIFORNIA Tulare County - Tulare County Jail 200 167 33 100 94 2 83.5% 94.0% 16.5% 2.0%
OREGON Multnomah County - Multnomah County Jail 51 39 8 10 6 1 76.5% 60.0% 15.7% 10.0%
MARYLAND Montgomery County - Montgomery County Det. 129 50 16 73 62 15 38.8% 84.9% 12.4% 20.5%
CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County - Los Angeles Police Pd 77th Div. 81 76 10 45 41 0 93.8% 91.1% 12.3% 0.0%
FLORIDA Palm Beach County - Palm Beach County Jail 137 92 15 44 40 1 67.2% 90.9% 10.9% 2.3%
CALIFORNIA Santa Cruz County - Santa Cruz Co Main Jail 58 50 6 29 27 1 86.2% 93.1% 10.3% 3.4%
NEW MEXICO Bernalillo County - Metropolitan Detention Center 52 42 5 9 5 0 80.8% 55.6% 9.6% 0.0%
OHIO Franklin County - Franklin County Jail 263 190 21 34 31 3 72.2% 91.2% 8.0% 8.8%
MISSISSIPPI Yazoo County - Yazoo City Medium Fci 57 28 4 46 11 0 49.1% 23.9% 7.0% 0.0%
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA District of Columbia - DC Department of Corrections 100 58 7 24 19 0 58.0% 79.2% 7.0% 0.0%
NEW YORK Suffolk County - Suffolk Co.Correc Fac 250 139 17 99 61 6 55.6% 61.6% 6.8% 6.1%
LOUISIANA Grant Parish - Pollock F.C.I. 78 51 5 52 43 1 65.4% 82.7% 6.4% 1.9%
CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County - Long Beach City Jail 63 49 4 26 24 1 77.8% 92.3% 6.3% 3.8%
FLORIDA Okaloosa County - Okaloosa County D.O.C. 80 56 5 15 8 0 70.0% 53.3% 6.3% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County - Los Angeles City Jail 664 606 40 300 272 3 91.3% 90.7% 6.0% 1.0%
FLORIDA Polk County - Polk County Jail 50 31 3 15 6 0 62.0% 40.0% 6.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Madera County - Madera Co Dept Of Correct 72 41 4 25 21 0 56.9% 84.0% 5.6% 0.0%
NEBRASKA Douglas County - Douglas County Correction Facility 72 50 4 19 16 0 69.4% 84.2% 5.6% 0.0%
FLORIDA Hillsborough County - Hillsborough County Jail 198 124 9 73 43 1 62.6% 58.9% 4.5% 1.4%
FLORIDA Orange County - Orange County Jail 194 143 7 90 66 1 73.7% 73.3% 3.6% 1.1%
CALIFORNIA Orange County - Orange County Jail 595 506 21 450 296 12 85.0% 65.8% 3.5% 2.7%
NEW YORK Westchester County - Westchester Co.Jail,valha 86 36 3 30 19 1 41.9% 63.3% 3.5% 3.3%
NEVADA Clark County - Las Vegas City Jail 118 31 4 178 43 0 26.3% 24.2% 3.4% 0.0%
ALABAMA Pickens County - Aliceville Fci 62 21 1 119 22 0 33.9% 18.5% 1.6% 0.0%
FLORIDA Lee County - Lee County Jail 71 59 1 76 65 0 83.1% 85.5% 1.4% 0.0%
NEVADA Clark County - City Of Las Vegas Det.Center 71 11 1 1 0 0 15.5% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0%
NEW JERSEY Middlesex County - Middlesex County Jail 71 31 1 34 26 0 43.7% 76.5% 1.4% 0.0%
SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort County - Beaufort County Det Center 89 76 1 32 25 0 85.4% 78.1% 1.1% 0.0%
GEORGIA Charlton County - D. Ray James Prison 213 56 2 176 142 0 26.3% 80.7% 0.9% 0.0%
FLORIDA Duval County - Duval/Jacksonville Jail 107 22 1 47 16 0 20.6% 34.0% 0.9% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Kern County - Ccf-Delano 115 111 1 96 94 0 96.5% 97.9% 0.9% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Wake County - N.C. Dept Of Corrections 116 69 1 69 51 0 59.5% 73.9% 0.9% 0.0%
ILLINOIS DuPage County - Dupage County Jail 128 54 1 61 31 0 42.2% 50.8% 0.8% 0.0%
FLORIDA Collier County - Collier County Sheriff Facility 280 66 2 111 25 0 23.6% 22.5% 0.7% 0.0%
SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston County - Charleston County Correctional Facility 160 113 1 37 12 0 70.6% 32.4% 0.6% 0.0%
GEORGIA DeKalb County - Dekalb County Jail 191 72 1 33 19 0 37.7% 57.6% 0.5% 0.0%
NEW YORK Nassau County - Nassau County Correctional Center 212 104 1 84 48 1 49.1% 57.1% 0.5% 1.2%
NORTH CAROLINA Mecklenburg County - Mecklenburg County Jail Central 232 110 1 154 94 1 47.4% 61.0% 0.4% 0.6%
VIRGINIA Fairfax City - Fairfax County Jail 233 52 1 73 38 0 22.3% 52.1% 0.4% 0.0%
ILLINOIS Will County - Stateville Corrections 250 146 1 185 142 0 58.4% 76.8% 0.4% 0.0%
ARIZONA Pima County - Pima County Jail 261 78 1 120 54 1 29.9% 45.0% 0.4% 0.8%
UTAH Salt Lake County - Salt Lake County Jail 282 65 1 152 76 0 23.0% 50.0% 0.4% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Kern County - Taft Fed.Corr.Inst. 327 146 1 242 194 0 44.6% 80.2% 0.3% 0.0%
OKLAHOMA Oklahoma County - Oklahoma County Jail 328 325 1 62 61 0 99.1% 98.4% 0.3% 0.0%
VIRGINIA Manassas City - Prince William Facility 398 106 1 174 50 0 26.6% 28.7% 0.3% 0.0%
GEORGIA Gwinnett County - Gwinnett County Jail 627 152 1 247 86 0 24.2% 34.8% 0.2% 0.0%
ARIZONA Maricopa County - Aspc Alhambra 739 277 0 689 568 1 37.5% 82.4% 0.0% 0.1%
ARIZONA Maricopa County - Maricopa Co Lower Buckeye Jail 82 12 0 72 12 0 14.6% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%
ARIZONA Maricopa County - Maricopa County Jail 1,479 137 0 503 116 1 9.3% 23.1% 0.0% 0.2%
ARIZONA Maricopa County - Us Marshal - Phoenix 312 72 0 279 143 0 23.1% 51.3% 0.0% 0.0%
ARIZONA Navajo County - Navajo County Sheriff 55 11 0 10 1 0 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ARIZONA Pima County - Us Marshal - Tucson 85 30 0 59 36 0 35.3% 61.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ARIZONA Pinal County - Pinal County Jail 70 36 0 49 35 1 51.4% 71.4% 0.0% 2.0%
ARIZONA Santa Cruz County - Santa Cruz Co Jail Az 102 78 0 8 5 0 76.5% 62.5% 0.0% 0.0%
ARKANSAS Washington County - Washington County Jail 59 46 0 46 25 0 78.0% 54.3% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Imperial County - Calipatria State Prison 204 141 0 43 23 0 69.1% 53.5% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Kern County - Wasco State Prison 149 127 0 220 196 0 85.2% 89.1% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Orange County - Anaheim City Jail 74 67 0 43 42 2 90.5% 97.7% 0.0% 4.7%
CALIFORNIA San Bernardino County - Fci Victorville 66 41 0 199 120 0 62.1% 60.3% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA San Luis Obispo County - Calif. Men Colony, East 79 71 0 30 28 0 89.9% 93.3% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara County - Lompoc U.S. Prison 115 18 0 101 37 0 15.7% 36.6% 0.0% 0.0%
CALIFORNIA Stanislaus County - Stanislaus County Jail 88 88 0 48 47 0 100.0% 97.9% 0.0% 0.0%
COLORADO El Paso County - Colo Dept Of Corrections 181 150 0 110 98 0 82.9% 89.1% 0.0% 0.0%
COLORADO El Paso County - El Paso County Jail 77 25 0 38 30 3 32.5% 78.9% 0.0% 7.9%
FLORIDA Leon County - Fl Dept Of Corrections 134 87 0 110 87 0 64.9% 79.1% 0.0% 0.0%
FLORIDA Martin County - Martin County Jail 83 26 0 11 10 0 31.3% 90.9% 0.0% 0.0%
FLORIDA Miami-Dade County - South Florida Recept Cent 73 52 0 52 46 0 71.2% 88.5% 0.0% 0.0%
FLORIDA Sumter County - Coleman Fci 78 38 0 42 26 0 48.7% 61.9% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Cherokee County - Cherokee Co Jail Ga 67 28 0 19 6 0 41.8% 31.6% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Clayton County - Clayton County Jail 126 60 0 39 34 0 47.6% 87.2% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Cobb County - Cobb County Jail 193 91 0 81 18 0 47.2% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Fulton County - Fulton County Jail 83 42 0 30 18 0 50.6% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Fulton County - Georgia Dept Of Correctio 128 78 0 77 63 0 60.9% 81.8% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Hall County - Hall County Jail 115 28 0 56 24 0 24.3% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0%
GEORGIA Whitfield County - Whitfield County Jail 53 38 0 18 13 0 71.7% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0%
IDAHO Cassia County - Minicassia Detention Center 61 32 0 15 6 0 52.5% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0%
INDIANA Bartholomew County - Bartholomew County Sheriff/Jail 53 53 0 7 7 0 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
LOUISIANA Jefferson Parish - Jefferson Parish Cor. Center 50 49 0 25 16 0 98.0% 64.0% 0.0% 0.0%
MICHIGAN Oakland County - Oakland Co., Pontiac, Mi 50 12 0 13 7 0 24.0% 53.8% 0.0% 0.0%
MISSISSIPPI Adams County - Adams County Det Center 153 57 0 176 38 0 37.3% 21.6% 0.0% 0.0%
MISSISSIPPI Forrest County - Forrest County A.D.C. 60 37 0 18 10 0 61.7% 55.6% 0.0% 0.0%
MISSISSIPPI Harrison County - Harrison Detention Center 90 57 0 30 19 0 63.3% 63.3% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW JERSEY Bergen County - Bergen County Jail 95 41 0 38 13 0 43.2% 34.2% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW JERSEY Hudson County - Hudson County Correctional Facility (Jail) 159 74 0 133 83 0 46.5% 62.4% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW JERSEY Monmouth County - Monmouth County Correctional Institution (Jail) 88 30 0 24 14 1 34.1% 58.3% 0.0% 4.2%
NEW JERSEY Passaic County - Passaic County Jail 103 27 0 50 31 0 26.2% 62.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW MEXICO Cibola County - Cibola County Det Ctr 52 24 0 43 35 0 46.2% 81.4% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW YORK Dutchess County - Downstate Cf, Fishkill 64 53 0 49 47 0 82.8% 95.9% 0.0% 0.0%
NEW YORK Ulster County - Ulster Cf, Napanoch 60 40 0 51 40 0 66.7% 78.4% 0.0% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Durham County - Durham County Det. Center 56 46 0 20 13 0 82.1% 65.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Forsyth County - Forsyth County Jail 57 53 0 18 18 0 93.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Hertford County - Rivers Correctional Institution 114 24 0 178 61 0 21.1% 34.3% 0.0% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Union County - Union County Jail 55 35 0 4 1 0 63.6% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%
NORTH CAROLINA Wake County - Wake County Sheriff Dept. 320 190 0 122 50 1 59.4% 41.0% 0.0% 0.8%
OHIO Butler County - Butler County Correctional Complex (Jail) 57 21 0 33 12 0 36.8% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0%
OHIO Hamilton County - Hamilton County Jail 93 48 0 28 13 0 51.6% 46.4% 0.0% 0.0%
OHIO Mahoning County - Northeast Ohio Corr. Fac. 107 14 0 1 1 0 13.1% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
OKLAHOMA Tulsa County - David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center (Jail) 321 57 0 144 39 0 17.8% 27.1% 0.0% 0.0%
PENNSYLVANIA Centre County - Moshannon Valley Correctional 364 223 0 302 202 0 61.3% 66.9% 0.0% 0.0%
PENNSYLVANIA Chester County - Chester Cnty Jail, Pa 55 16 0 24 11 0 29.1% 45.8% 0.0% 0.0%
PENNSYLVANIA Cumberland County - Camphill Sci, Pa 57 46 0 64 59 0 80.7% 92.2% 0.0% 0.0%
SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville County - Greenville County Det Center 110 84 0 36 25 0 76.4% 69.4% 0.0% 0.0%
SOUTH CAROLINA Horry County - Horry County-J Ruben Long Det Cen 85 54 0 21 7 0 63.5% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
TENNESSEE Davidson County - Davidson County Sheriff Facility 145 112 0 98 84 0 77.2% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TENNESSEE Hamblen County - Hamblen County Jail 64 34 0 21 8 0 53.1% 38.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TENNESSEE Hamilton County - Hamilton Co. Jail (Tenn) 74 47 0 26 16 0 63.5% 61.5% 0.0% 0.0%
TENNESSEE Rutherford County - Rutherford County Sheriff 56 51 0 31 21 0 91.1% 67.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TENNESSEE Shelby County - Shelby Co. Sheriff Office 81 73 0 43 39 1 90.1% 90.7% 0.0% 2.3%
TEXAS Anderson County - Gurney Transfer Facility 68 43 0 115 94 0 63.2% 81.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Bastrop County - Bastrop County Jail 70 32 0 23 10 1 45.7% 43.5% 0.0% 4.3%
TEXAS Bee County - Garza West Transfer Facility 129 83 0 184 157 0 64.3% 85.3% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Bell County - Bell County Jail 60 43 0 31 17 0 71.7% 54.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Bexar County - Bexar County Jail 312 172 0 82 35 1 55.1% 42.7% 0.0% 1.2%
TEXAS Bexar County - San Antonio (City Of) Magistrate 273 47 0 83 21 0 17.2% 25.3% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Bexar County - Us Marshals,west.Dist.,tx 132 24 0 59 39 0 18.2% 66.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Brazos County - Brazos County Jail 61 13 0 27 21 0 21.3% 77.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Cameron County - Brownsville Police Dept. 126 18 0 100 20 0 14.3% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Cameron County - Candadian County, El Reno 122 33 0 104 30 0 27.0% 28.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Cameron County - Us Marshals Sdtx 56 55 0 1 0 0 98.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Collin County - Collin County Jail 76 33 0 93 43 0 43.4% 46.2% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Concho County - Ci Eden 414 79 0 397 189 0 19.1% 47.6% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Dallas County - Dallas County Jail 941 241 0 513 195 0 25.6% 38.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Dallas County - Irving Police Dept. 96 21 0 33 12 0 21.9% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Denton County - Carrollton Police Dept. 110 15 0 36 10 0 13.6% 27.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Fort Bend County - Ft. Bend County Jail 288 219 0 175 133 0 76.0% 76.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Galveston County - Galveston County Sheriff 50 22 0 18 14 0 44.0% 77.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Garza County - Bscc Giles Darby Facility 152 28 0 240 126 0 18.4% 52.5% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Garza County - Dalby Correctional Institute 54 10 0 58 22 0 18.5% 37.9% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Harris County - Harris County Jail 1,516 254 0 802 229 0 16.8% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Harris County - Tdc - Pam Lychner 130 29 0 67 27 0 22.3% 40.3% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Harris County - Us Marshal, Southern District, Tx 158 137 0 31 31 0 86.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - Alamo Police Dept. 68 8 0 26 6 0 11.8% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - Donna Police Dept. 55 13 0 28 8 0 23.6% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - Edinburg Police Department 58 8 0 46 11 0 13.8% 23.9% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - Hidalgo County Jail 707 264 0 489 198 0 37.3% 40.5% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - Mission Police Dept. 80 19 0 34 6 0 23.8% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Hidalgo County - US Marshalls, Southern District Texas 208 195 0 3 2 0 93.8% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Howard County - Bscc Flightline Unit 375 58 0 185 42 0 15.5% 22.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS McLennan County - Mclennan County Jail 98 49 0 68 44 0 50.0% 64.7% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Midland County - Midland Detention Center 51 47 0 36 35 0 92.2% 97.2% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Montgomery County - Montgomery County Jail 119 53 0 125 50 0 44.5% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Nueces County - Nueces County Jail 50 16 0 19 8 0 32.0% 42.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Reeves County - Reeves County Det. Center 113 11 0 132 24 0 9.7% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Starr County - Starr County Jail 152 45 0 65 24 0 29.6% 36.9% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Tarrant County - Arlington Police Dept. 91 17 0 41 8 0 18.7% 19.5% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Tarrant County - Mansfield L.E. Center 60 14 0 80 39 0 23.3% 48.8% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Tarrant County - Tarrant County Jail 162 29 0 171 60 0 17.9% 35.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Taylor County - Texas Doc - Middleton Unit 75 44 0 117 104 0 58.7% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Travis County - Austin DRO Hold Room 60 11 0 7 3 0 18.3% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Travis County - Travis Cty Jail 744 236 0 655 421 4 31.7% 64.3% 0.0% 0.6%
TEXAS Walker County - Holliday Transfer Unit 212 131 0 95 78 0 61.8% 82.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Walker County - Huntsville State P. 204 98 0 227 152 0 48.0% 67.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Walker County - Texas Dcj - Goree Unit 101 77 0 3 3 0 76.2% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Webb County - Webb County Jail 271 265 0 173 168 0 97.8% 97.1% 0.0% 0.0%
TEXAS Willacy County - Ci Willacy 147 131 0 0 0 0 89.1% 0.0% 0.0% -
TEXAS Williamson County - Williamson County Jail 147 64 0 58 34 0 43.5% 58.6% 0.0% 0.0%
UTAH Utah County - Utah County Jail 78 45 0 44 15 0 57.7% 34.1% 0.0% 0.0%
VIRGINIA Arlington County - Arlington County Jail 107 17 0 41 18 0 15.9% 43.9% 0.0% 0.0%
VIRGINIA Chesterfield County - Chesterfield Co. Jail 86 31 0 41 22 0 36.0% 53.7% 0.0% 0.0%
VIRGINIA Fredericksburg City - Rapp Sec Center 59 16 0 23 13 0 27.1% 56.5% 0.0% 0.0%
VIRGINIA Loudoun County - Loudoun County 68 12 0 26 8 0 17.6% 30.8% 0.0% 0.0%
WASHINGTON Pierce County - Pierce County Jail 64 17 0 15 7 0 26.6% 46.7% 0.0% 0.0%
WISCONSIN Milwaukee County - Milwaukee County Jail 70 21 0 27 8 0 30.0% 29.6% 0.0% 0.0%
* Includes all law enforcement facilities with 50 or more I-247s recorded in the "before PEP" period of June - October 2014.
** ICE did not assume custody and it recorded refusal by law enforcement agency (LEA) sent detainer or notice request.

Footnotes

[1] ICE lists law enforcement agencies by county that passed legislation or adopted restrictive policies limiting their cooperation in turning over individuals to ICE custody in response to detainers the agency issued.

[2] The data for the most recent period reflect ICE's records as of April 4, 2016. While ICE data indicate that the typical lag between when an I-247 is issued and the transfer to ICE custody takes place is 19 days and the most common is just a single day, a small number of recorded custody transfers occur more than four months after a I- 247 form is issued. Thus, for the most recent time period these figures may slightly undercount the transfers that eventually will occur.