Detainees Leaving ICE Detention from the
Seattle Field Office Holding Room
Seattle, Washington
Detainees Deported or Released Number last 12 months 30 Out of total detained 682 Percent change: from previous 12 months 7 % from FY 2005 - from FY 2000 - Facility ranking on detainees top 78 %
Table 1: Number leaving ICE detention
from this facilityDuring the most recent 12 month period for which data are available, a total of 30 detainees housed at the Seattle Field Office Holding Room left that facility because they were deported, were released under supervision while their cases were being decided, or left ICE detention for one of a variety of other reasons. This is a special ICE holding area or staging location that under current ICE detention standards is allowed to temporarily house aliens for up to 12 or 16 hours. These types of units generally have no sleeping quarters or shower facilities.
Those individuals who departed from this facility because they were leaving ICE detention made up 4 percent of the 682 detainees housed at this facility during the last 12 months. This report focuses on the reasons these individuals left ICE detention. Sometimes this report speaks of these individuals as those "exiting" ICE detention, or simply as "exits." The other 96 percent remained in ICE detention but were transferred from the Seattle Field Office Holding Room to other facilities.
This report covers those who left ICE custody. It excludes individuals transferred to other ICE facilities. For more information on this facility, including individuals that were transferred, see additional TRAC reports in this series.
This report series is based upon analyses conducted by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University of 3.4 million government records tracking each individual who passed through an ICE detention facility during the past decade. The most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available is for April 2007 through March 2008. See About the Data.
How This Facility Ranks Nationally
Rankings on the number leaving ICE detention. The Seattle Field Office Holding Room was one of 1,528 facilities that were used to house immigration detainees during the last decade, and one of 654 facilities nationwide that housed ICE detainees during the most recent 12 month period. Of these 654, there were 324 facilities that had at least 10 individuals who were deported or released. Excluding those facilities with fewer than 10 exits, the Seattle Field Office Holding Room last year ranked in the top 78 percent nationwide in the number of individuals leaving ICE detention. This means that 78 percent of the locations contributed the same or a larger numbers of exits, while 22 percent had a smaller number. See Table 1.
Deportations. Nationally, the most common reason that a detainee left ICE detention was that they were deported from the United States. During the most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available, nationwide 81 percent of those leaving ICE detention were deported or "voluntarily" departed. By way of comparison, a lower percentage of detainees (73 percent) left the country from the Seattle Field Office Holding Room because they were formally deported, or left under the so-called "voluntary departure" procedure.
Trends in the Number of Detainees Deported or Released
Trends in the number leaving ICE detention. When deportations and other releases during the April 2007-March 2008 period were compared with those in the previous 12 months, the Seattle Field Office Holding Room numbers were up by 7 percent. During the April 2006-March 2007 period the facility processed 28 "exits" as compared with 30 last year.
Longer term exit trends. Greater detail on these long-term trends for those leaving ICE detention from the Seattle Field Office Holding Room are displayed in Figure 1. Here the month-by-month number of exits are graphed against the backdrop of the total detainees leaving the custody of this facility. Exits are displayed with darker shading while those transferred appear with lighter shading. As is readily apparent, considerable variation has occurred over time in both the overall numbers of detainees as well as the volume leaving ICE detention during this period.
Exit trends are also summarized by fiscal year in Table 2. Year-by-year figures for the Seattle Field Office Holding Room are given for the total number of detainees as compared with those leaving ICE detention from the facility. The percent of detainees that left ICE detention is also given. (As mentioned above, the remaining detainees were transferred to another ICE detention facility.) Because data for all twelve months of the most recent fiscal year are not yet available, the FY 2008 numbers (October 2007 through September 2008) are estimated based upon reporting for the first six months.
Were Detained Individuals from the Local Area?
Information on the place of arrest was not included in the available data ICE released. However, we can examine whether the Seattle Field Office Holding Room was the first ICE facility in which these detainees were held. According to ICE records, for the vast majority (97 percent) of these detainees, the Seattle Field Office Holding Room was the first place they were sent when they were detained by ICE. The remaining 3 percent had been transferred in from another ICE detention facility.
We can also look at how quickly they arrived at this facility after they were first detained. Again, a total of 97 percent arrived at the Seattle Field Office Holding Room at some point during the very first day they were detained by ICE. There was considerable variability among detainees in the number of detention facilities they had been held in before they were finally deported or released from this facility. All detainees either entered and left this one facility, or had spent time at one additional ICE facility before their transfer to the Seattle Field Office Holding Room. These figures again are based on an analysis of the most recent 12 months for which data are available.
For the United States as a whole, last year the typical detainee stayed in two different ICE detention facilities before being deported or released - half stayed in 2 or fewer facilities, and half stayed in 2 or more. The average number of ICE facilities detainees moved through was 1.9. Detainees at the Seattle Field Office Holding Room on average had stayed at somewhat fewer (1.0) ICE facilities.
Reason Left ICE Facility Profile U.S Profile Number Percent Percent Deported/Removed 22 73 % 72 % Orders of Recognizance or Supervision 5 17 % 5 % Paroled 1 3 % 0 % Proceedings Terminated 1 3 % 2 % U.S. Marshal or Other Agency 1 3 % 3 % Bonded out 0 . 8 % Died 0 . 0 % Escaped 0 . 0 % Voluntary departure 0 . 10 % Withdrawal 0 . 1 % Total 30 100 % 100 %
Table 3: Reasons individuals left ICE detention during the last 12 months
Why Did Detainees Leave ICE Detention?
ICE records one of twenty-three reasons a detainee left ICE detention. As shown in Table 3, these reasons fall into ten general categories -- from leaving because one is deported or removed, to leaving because one escaped or the individual died while in custody.
Deportation. As mentioned earlier, the most common reason detainees left the Seattle Field Office Holding Room was that they were deported. A total of 22 individuals (73 percent) were deported or removed from the Seattle Field Office Holding Room during the most recent 12 month period for which data are available. (ICE data did not distinguish between deportations and removals, and the terms are used interchangeably in this report.)
Orders. Orders are additional mechanisms that are sometimes used to release a person while their case is pending, or awaiting removal. Under an "order of recognizance" an individual is released with reporting conditions while in deportation proceedings and awaiting a final decision. A second type of order ("order of supervision") releases an individual after a final order of removal. Here an individual is released because ICE has not met the time limits the law imposes for deporting the individual. There were 5 (17 percent) who left the Seattle Field Office Holding Room detention for these reasons: one with an order of recognizance, and 4 with orders of supervision.
Parole. ICE also has discretionary authority to "parole" individuals and give them temporary entry into the country, often on humanitarian grounds. Individuals with serious medical conditions, pregnant women, and certain juveniles are among the categories considered. Other categories are individuals who will serve as witnesses in judicial or administrative proceedings, and individuals whose parole is considered by ICE in the "public interest." One individual was paroled from this facility.
No legitimate grounds to deport. Sometimes individuals left ICE detention because they "won" their case. Typically this occurs when an Immigration Judge orders the deportation proceedings ICE has filed against them "terminated" (dismissed) and the judge's order after any appeals becomes final. Analysis of the latest 12 months of data show that one individual was released from detention by the Seattle Field Office Holding Room because a determination was made that there were no grounds to deport the individual and thus ICE had to release him or her from custody.
Transferred to criminal custody. A total of 1 individuals (3 percent) left this facility last year because they were turned over to U.S. Marshals or to some other government agency. This typically occurs because there is an outstanding criminal case against the individual, or the individual is needed as a material witness in a criminal case.
Escape and death. Nationally, there were 92 individuals who escaped ICE detention during the latest 12 month period for which data are available, and 8 individuals were recorded as having died in detention. No one was recorded by the Seattle Field Office Holding Room as either escaping or dying last year. Over the past decade, there was also no record of anyone who died or escaped from this facility.
As shown in Table 3, no one was recorded as leaving the Seattle Field Office Holding Room during the past 12 months for the following reasons: Bonded out, Voluntary departure and Withdrawal. See "Reasons for Leaving ICE Detention" for a description of these categories.
Comparing Release Reasons Against The National Picture
In many respects release reasons for the Seattle Field Office Holding Room departed from the national picture. No one left as a voluntary departure from this facility, while this was true for 10 percent of all individuals nationally.
In addition, differences were seen for detainees released on orders of recognizance or supervision (17 versus 5 percent), and individuals released on bond (none versus 8 percent).
The facility's percentages fell within 3 percentage points of the national figures for all other categories.
Nationalities
Which nationalities predominate? Last year in the United States, individuals from Mexico comprised the largest number of those leaving ICE detention. Some 53.6 percent of all detainees recorded Mexico as their country of origin. The Seattle Field Office Holding Room had a much larger proportion of detainees from Mexico - 80 percent among their exits. Detainees from Mexico were also the largest single nationality group among those leaving detention from the facility.
Nationalities Ranked in Top 10 Left ICE Detention Total Deported/
Voluntary
DeparturePercent - ALL 30 22 73.3 % 1 Mexico 24 22 91.6 % 2 Cambodia 1 0 0.0 % Canada 1 0 0.0 % Chile 1 0 0.0 % Cuba 1 0 0.0 % Russia 1 0 0.0 % Thailand 1 0 0.0 %
Table 4: Numbers leaving ICE detention by nationality
during the last 12 months
In descending order, the other top nationalities after Mexico that made up those leaving ICE detention from the Seattle Field Office Holding Room last year were: Cambodia (3%), Canada (3%), Chile (3%), Cuba (3%), Russia (3%) and Thailand (3%). This compared to the United States as a whole where the other top five nationalities after Mexico were Honduras (11.0%), Guatemala (10.0%), El Salvador (8.4%) and Dominican Republic (1.6%).
